Fully Bayesian Inference under Ignorable Missingness in the Presence of Auxiliary Covariates

被引:14
作者
Daniels, M. J. [1 ,2 ]
Wang, C. [3 ]
Marcus, B. H. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Div Stat & Sci Computat, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Sect Integrat Biol, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sidney Kimmel Comprehens Canc Ctr, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Family & Prevent Med, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
Auxiliary variable MAR; Congenial imputation; Marginalized models; Multiple imputation; MULTIPLE-IMPUTATION; SMOKING-CESSATION; DROPOUT; MODELS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1111/biom.12121
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In order to make a missing at random (MAR) or ignorability assumption realistic, auxiliary covariates are often required. However, the auxiliary covariates are not desired in the model for inference. Typical multiple imputation approaches do not assume that the imputation model marginalizes to the inference model. This has been termed uncongenial [Meng (1994, Statistical Science9, 538-558)]. In order to make the two models congenial (or compatible), we would rather not assume a parametric model for the marginal distribution of the auxiliary covariates, but we typically do not have enough data to estimate the joint distribution well non-parametrically. In addition, when the imputation model uses a non-linear link function (e.g., the logistic link for a binary response), the marginalization over the auxiliary covariates to derive the inference model typically results in a difficult to interpret form for the effect of covariates. In this article, we propose a fully Bayesian approach to ensure that the models are compatible for incomplete longitudinal data by embedding an interpretable inference model within an imputation model and that also addresses the two complications described above. We evaluate the approach via simulations and implement it on a recent clinical trial.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 72
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, SURV METHODOL
[2]  
Besag J, 2001, STAT SCI, V16, P265
[3]   Predictors of quitting and dropout among women in a clinic-based smoking cessation program [J].
Borrelli, B ;
Hogan, JW ;
Bock, B ;
Pinto, B ;
Roberts, M ;
Marcus, B .
PSYCHOLOGY OF ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2002, 16 (01) :22-27
[4]   Multiple imputation was an efficient method for harmonizing the Mini-Mental State Examination with missing item-level data [J].
Burns, Richard A. ;
Butterworth, Peter ;
Kiely, Kim M. ;
Bielak, Allison A. M. ;
Luszcz, Mary A. ;
Mitchell, Paul ;
Christensen, Helen ;
Von Sanden, Chwee ;
Anstey, Kaarin J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 64 (07) :787-793
[5]  
Daniels MJ, 2008, MONOGR STAT APPL PRO, V109, P1
[6]   A prior for the variance in hierarchical models [J].
Daniels, MJ .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS-REVUE CANADIENNE DE STATISTIQUE, 1999, 27 (03) :567-578
[7]   Marginalized transition models and likelihood inference for longitudinal categorical data [J].
Heagerty, PJ .
BIOMETRICS, 2002, 58 (02) :342-351
[8]   Spike and slab variable selection: Frequentist and Bayesian strategies [J].
Ishwaran, H ;
Rao, JS .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2005, 33 (02) :730-773
[9]   Multiple imputation: current perspectives [J].
Kenward, Michael G. ;
Carpenter, James .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2007, 16 (03) :199-218
[10]   A MULTIPLE IMPUTATION STRATEGY FOR CLINICAL-TRIALS WITH TRUNCATION OF PATIENT DATA [J].
LAVORI, PW ;
DAWSON, R ;
SHERA, D .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1995, 14 (17) :1913-1925