Anaerobic digestion and milking frequency as mitigation strategies of the environmental burden in the milk production system

被引:49
作者
Bacenetti, Jacopo [1 ]
Bava, Luciana [1 ]
Zucali, Maddalena [1 ]
Lovarelli, Daniela [1 ]
Sandrucci, Anna [1 ]
Tamburini, Alberto [1 ]
Fiala, Marco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Agr & Environm Sci, Prod, Landscape,Agroenergy, I-20133 Milan, Italy
关键词
Milk; Life Cycle Assessment; Dairy farm; Biogas; Milking frequency; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; NEUTRAL DETERGENT FIBER; DIFFERENT CROP SYSTEMS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; CARBON FOOTPRINT; METHANE PRODUCTION; RICE CULTIVATION; MAIZE SILAGE; DAIRY FARMS; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.015
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to assess, through a cradle to farm gate Life Cycle Assessment, different mitigation strategies of the potential environmental impacts of milk production at farm level. The environmental performances of a conventional intensive dairy farm in Northern Italy (baseline scenario) were compared with the results obtained: from the introduction of the third daily milking and from the adoption of anaerobic digestion (AD) of animal slurry in a consortium AD plant The AD plant, fed only with animal slurries coming also from nearby farms. Key parameters concerning on-farm activities (forage production, energy consumptions, agricultural machines maintenance, manure and livestock management), off-farm activities (production of fertilizers, pesticides, bedding materials, purchased forages, purchased concentrate feed, replacement animals, agricultural machines manufacturing, electricity, fuel) and transportation were considered. The functional unit was 1 kg fat and protein corrected milk (FPCM) leaving the farm gate. The selected environmental impact categories were: global warming potential, acidification, eutrophication, photochemical oxidation and non-renewable energy use. The production of 1 kg of FPCM caused, in the baseline scenario, the following environmental impact potentials: global warming potential 1.12 kg CO2 eq; acidification 15.5 g SO2 eq; eutrophication 5.62 g PO43- eq; photochemical oxidation 0.87 g C2H4 eq/kg FPCM; energy use 4.66 MJ eq. The increase of milking frequency improved environmental performances for all impact categories in comparison with the baseline scenario; in particular acidification and eutrophication potentials showed the largest reductions ( -11 and -12%, respectively). In anaerobic digestion scenario, compared to the baseline one, most of the impact potentials were strongly reduced. In particular the most important advantages were in terms of acidification (-29%), global warming (-22%) and eutrophication potential (-18%). The AD of cow slurry is confirmed as an effective strategy to mitigate the environmental impact of milk production at farm level. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 459
页数:10
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] Althaus H.-J., 2007, 8 EC EMPA SWISS CTR
  • [2] Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions during storage and after application of dairy cattle slurry and influence of slurry treatment
    Amon, B
    Kryvoruchko, V
    Amon, T
    Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 112 (2-3) : 153 - 162
  • [3] The effects of low vs. high concentrate level in the diet on performance in cows milked two or three times daily in early lactation
    Andersen, JB
    Friggens, NC
    Sejrsen, K
    Sorensen, MT
    Munksgaard, L
    Ingvartsen, KL
    [J]. LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2003, 81 (2-3): : 119 - 128
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2007, 15 SWISS CTR LIF CYC
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2007, 14 EC SWISS CTR CYCL
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2006, IPCC GUID NAT GREENH
  • [7] [Anonymous], EMEP EEA AIR POLLUTA
  • [8] [Anonymous], SCI TOTAL ENV
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2007, 17 SWISS CTR LIF CYC
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2003, COM2003302 CEC