Computing the Rearrangement Distance of Natural Genomes

被引:22
作者
Bohnenkamper, Leonard [1 ,2 ]
Braga, Marilia D. V. [1 ,2 ]
Doerr, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Stoye, Jens [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Bielefeld Univ, Fac Technol, Postfach 10 01 31, D-33501 Bielefeld, Germany
[2] Bielefeld Univ, Ctr Biotechnol CeBiTec, Postfach 10 01 31, D-33501 Bielefeld, Germany
关键词
comparative genomics; DCJ-indel distance; genome rearrangements; POLYNOMIAL ALGORITHM; DOUBLE-CUT; JOIN; PERMUTATIONS; INSERTIONS;
D O I
10.1089/cmb.2020.0434
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The computation of genomic distances has been a very active field of computational comparative genomics over the past 25 years. Substantial results include the polynomial-time computability of the inversion distance by Hannenhalli and Pevzner in 1995 and the introduction of the double cut and join distance by Yancopoulos et al. in 2005. Both results, however, rely on the assumption that the genomes under comparison contain the same set of unique markers (syntenic genomic regions, sometimes also referred to as genes). In 2015, Shao et al. relax this condition by allowing for duplicate markers in the analysis. This generalized version of the genomic distance problem is NP-hard, and they give an integer linear programming (ILP) solution that is efficient enough to be applied to real-world datasets. A restriction of their approach is that it can be applied only to balanced genomes that have equal numbers of duplicates of any marker. Therefore, it still needs a delicate preprocessing of the input data in which excessive copies of unbalanced markers have to be removed. In this article, we present an algorithm solving the genomic distance problem for natural genomes, in which any marker may occur an arbitrary number of times. Our method is based on a new graph data structure, the multi-relational diagram, that allows an elegant extension of the ILP by Shao et al. to count runs of markers that are under- or over-represented in one genome with respect to the other and need to be inserted or deleted, respectively. With this extension, previous restrictions on the genome configurations are lifted, for the first time enabling an uncompromising rearrangement analysis. Any marker sequence can directly be used for the distance calculation. The evaluation of our approach shows that it can be used to analyze genomes with up to a few 10,000 markers, which we demonstrate on simulated and real data.
引用
收藏
页码:410 / 431
页数:22
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   OMA standalone: orthology inference among public and custom genomes and transcriptomes [J].
Altenhoff, Adrian M. ;
Levy, Jeremy ;
Zarowiecki, Magdalena ;
Tomiczek, Bartlomiej ;
Vesztrocy, Alex Warwick ;
Dalquen, Daniel A. ;
Mueller, Steven ;
Telford, Maximilian J. ;
Glover, Natasha M. ;
Dylus, David ;
Dessimoz, Christophe .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2019, 29 (07) :1152-1163
[2]   On the approximability of comparing genomes with duplicates [J].
Angibaud, Sébastien ;
Fertin, Guillaume ;
Rusu, Irena ;
Thévenin, Annelyse ;
Vialette, Stéphane .
Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications, 2009, 13 (01) :19-53
[3]  
Bergeron A, 2006, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V4175, P163
[4]   Computing the Rearrangement Distance of Natural Genomes [J].
Bohnenkaemper, Leonard ;
Braga, Marilia D. V. ;
Doerr, Daniel ;
Stoye, Jens .
RESEARCH IN COMPUTATIONAL MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, RECOMB 2020, 2020, 12074 :3-18
[5]   Double Cut and Join with Insertions and Deletions [J].
Braga, Marilia D. V. ;
Willing, Eyla ;
Stoye, Jens .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2011, 18 (09) :1167-1184
[6]   The Solution Space of Sorting by DCJ [J].
Braga, Marilia D. V. ;
Stoye, Jens .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2010, 17 (09) :1145-1165
[7]  
Bryant D., 2000, Comparative Genomics, P207, DOI 10.1007/978-94-011-4309-7_19
[8]   Inapproximability of (1,2)-Exemplar Distance [J].
Bulteau, Laurent ;
Jiang, Minghui .
IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2013, 10 (06) :1384-1390
[9]   DCJ-Indel sorting revisited [J].
Compeau, Phillip E. C. .
ALGORITHMS FOR MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2013, 8
[10]  
Friedberg Richard, 2008, V452, P385, DOI 10.1007/978-1-60327-159-2_18