The Reasons of Atheists and Agnostics for Nonbelief in God's Existence Scale: Development and Initial Validation

被引:20
作者
Bradley, David F. [1 ]
Exline, Julie J. [1 ]
Uzdavines, Alex [1 ]
Stauner, Nick [1 ]
Grubbs, Joshua B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Psychol Sci, 10900 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Bowling Green State Univ, Dept Psychol, Bowling Green, OH 43403 USA
关键词
atheism; agnosticism; nonbelief; religion; personality; CONFORMITY; ATTITUDES; INTUITION; JUDGMENT; QUALITY; ORIGINS;
D O I
10.1037/rel0000199
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Research exploring nonbelievers' reasons for not believing in the existence of god(s) has focused on theory development. Such efforts are valuable, but may not capture the lived experiences of nonbelievers. The current two studies quantitatively examined nonbelievers' self-reported reasons for nonbelief through developing the Reasons of Atheists and Agnostics for Nonbelief in God's Existence Scale (RANGES). We developed an initial pool of 64 items using prior published research, revised by a panel of experts including researchers and thought leaders in nonbelief communities. Both studies included participants from Amazon's Mechanical Turk (Study 1 & 2 Ns = 520 & 369), all of whom reported not believing in god(s). In Study 1, our exploratory factor analysis suggested nine factors across 35 items. In Study 2, we confirmed the nine-factor structure using 38 items (35 from Study 1 plus three new items for better coverage of factors with few items) with adequate fit. Across both studies, the RANGES subscales showed good reliability, convergent validity (e.g., positive correlations with previous lists of reasons for religious doubt), predictive validity (e.g., positive and negative feelings toward God and religion), and discriminant validity (e.g., subscales were not unexpectedly associated with other measures). Our 1-year follow-up with a subset of Study 2 participants (N = 132) found different levels of stability among the RANGES subscales. This measure can promote further understanding the motivations, identities, and experiences of nonbelievers across cultures.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 275
页数:13
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Altemeyer B., 1997, Amazing conversions: Why some turn to faith others abandon religion
[2]  
Anderson Elizabeth, 2007, God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, GLOBAL INDEX RELIGIO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon, Patent No. [2104.06425, 210406425]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1986, The blind watchmaker: Why the evidence of evolution reveals a Universe without design
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2000, EMOTIONS BELIEFS FEE, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511659904, 10.1017/CBO9780511659904]
[7]   STUDIES OF INDEPENDENCE AND CONFORMITY .1. A MINORITY OF ONE AGAINST A UNANIMOUS MAJORITY [J].
ASCH, SE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 1956, 70 (09) :1-70
[8]   Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy [J].
Bechara, A ;
Damasio, H ;
Tranel, D ;
Damasio, AR .
SCIENCE, 1997, 275 (5304) :1293-1295
[9]   The muttidimensional nature of quest motivation [J].
Beck, R ;
Jessup, RK .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY AND THEOLOGY, 2004, 32 (04) :283-294
[10]   Attachment to god: The attachment to god inventory tests of working model correspondence, and an exploration of faith group differences [J].
Beck, R ;
McDonald, A .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY AND THEOLOGY, 2004, 32 (02) :92-103