TAXING TOP EARNERS: A HUMAN CAPITAL PERSPECTIVE

被引:25
作者
Badel, Alejandro
Huggett, Mark
Luo, Wenlan
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Washington, DC 20057 USA
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
PROGRESSIVE TAXATION; INCOME; ELASTICITIES; INEQUALITY; POLICY; TAXES; MICRO; MODEL;
D O I
10.1093/ej/ueaa021
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
An established view is that the revenue maximising top tax rate for the US is approximately 73%. In contrast, the revenue maximising top tax rate is approximately 49% in our quantitative human capital model. The key reason for the lower top tax rate is the presence of two new forces not captured by the model underlying the established view. These new forces are strengthened by the endogenous response of top earners' human capital to a change in the top tax rate.
引用
收藏
页码:1200 / 1225
页数:26
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   INTERTEMPORAL SUBSTITUTION IN LABOR SUPPLY - EVIDENCE FROM MICRO DATA [J].
ALTONJI, JG .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1986, 94 (03) :S176-S215
[2]   Top Earners: Cross-Country Facts [J].
Badel, Alejandro ;
Daly, Moira ;
Huggett, Mark ;
Nybom, Martin .
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ST LOUIS REVIEW, 2018, 100 (03) :237-257
[3]   The sufficient statistic approach: Predicting the top of the Laffer curve [J].
Badel, Alejandro ;
Huggett, Mark .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 2017, 87 :1-12
[4]  
Blandin A., 2016, REFORMING SOCIAL SEC
[5]  
Brewer M., 2010, Dimensions of Tax Design: The Mirrlees Review
[6]  
Bruggemann B., 2017, HIGHER TAXES TOP ROL
[7]  
BURMAN LE, 1994, NATL TAX J, V47, P1
[8]   A new method of estimating risk aversion [J].
Chetty, Raj .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2006, 96 (05) :1821-1834
[9]   The Case for a Progressive Tax: From Basic Research to Policy Recommendations [J].
Diamond, Peter ;
Saez, Emmanuel .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2011, 25 (04) :165-190
[10]   The labor-supply elasticity and borrowing constraints:: Why estimates are biased [J].
Domeij, D ;
Flodén, M .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2006, 9 (02) :242-262