Correlation of ADC and T2 Measurements With Cell Density in Prostate Cancer at 3.0 Tesla

被引:236
作者
Gibbs, Peter [1 ]
Liney, Gary P. [1 ]
Pickles, Martin D. [1 ]
Zelhof, Bashar [1 ]
Rodrigues, Greta [2 ]
Turnbull, Lindsay W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hull Royal Infirm, Ctr MR Invest, Div Canc, Postgrad Med Sch, Kingston Upon Hull HU3 2JZ, N Humberside, England
[2] Hull & E Yorkshire Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Pathol, Kingston Upon Hull, N Humberside, England
关键词
prostate cancer; cellularity; diffusion imaging; T2; mapping; APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT; IN-VIVO MEASUREMENT; WEIGHTED MRI; CELLULARITY; TISSUE; ECHO; BENIGN; VALUES; TUMORS; LINE;
D O I
10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181b4c10e
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess the relationship between MRI derived parameters (apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and T2 relaxation time) and tumor cellularity as determined from whole mounted radical prostatectomy specimens, for both prostatic carcinoma and normal peripheral zone tissue. Materials and Methods: Over a 16-month period, 20 patients (mean age: 61 years, range: 42-70 years) were prospectively recruited. Diffusion and T2 imaging were performed on a 3.0 Tesla scanner to enable subsequent ADC and T2 calculation. After radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens were whole-mounted and regions of interest (ROIs) drawn in areas of prostatic carcinoma and normal peripheral zone. Cell density was then determined using an adaptive histogram thresholding technique. Differences in tissue type were explored using the unpaired t test while the relationship between parameters was assessed using scatter-plots and the Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: Significant differences (P < 0.0001 in all cases) were noted between peripheral zone tissue and prostatic carcinoma in terms of ADC (1.88 +/- 0.22 vs. 1.43 +/- 0.19 X 10(-3) mm(2)/s), T2 (142 +/- 24 vs. 109 +/- 20 milliseconds), and cell density (9.4% +/- 3.0% vs. 19.8% +/- 5.3%). A significant negative correlation with cell density was noted for both ADC (R = -0.695, P < 0.0001) and T2 (R = -0.505, P = 0.001). Trends for increased cell density, decreased ADC, and decreased T2 with increasing Gleason score were also noted. Conclusions: ADC and to a lesser extent T2 are good indicators of cell density, Because of the potential link with Gleason score, MRI derived parameters may have a prognostic role with regard to potential metastatic activity and tumor aggressiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:572 / 576
页数:5
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Artemov D, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V42, P277, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199908)42:2<277::AID-MRM9>3.0.CO
  • [2] 2-9
  • [3] Prostate cancer: Accurate determination of extracapsular extension with high-spatial-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted MR imaging - Initial results
    Bloch, B. Nicolas
    Furman-Haran, Edna
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    Lenkinski, Robert E.
    Degani, Hadassa
    Kratzik, Christian
    Susani, Martin
    Haitel, Andrea
    Jaromi, Silvia
    Ngo, Long
    Rofsky, Neil M.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2007, 245 (01) : 176 - 185
  • [4] *CANC, CANC FACTS FIG 2007
  • [5] Detection of prostate cancer by integration of line-scan diffusion, T2-mapping and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; a multichannel statistical classifier
    Chan, I
    Wells, W
    Mulkern, RV
    Haker, S
    Zhang, JQ
    Zou, KH
    Maier, SE
    Tempany, CMC
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (09) : 2390 - 2398
  • [6] Prostate cancer detection: Comparison of T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, and the three techniques combined
    Chen, M.
    Dang, H. -D.
    Wang, J. -Y.
    Zhou, C.
    Li, S. -Y.
    Wang, W. -C.
    Zhao, W. -F.
    Yang, Z. -H.
    Zhong, C. -Y.
    Li, G. -Z.
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2008, 49 (05) : 602 - 610
  • [7] Dodd NJF, 1997, PHYS MEDICA, V13, P56
  • [8] Staging prostate cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced endorectal MR imaging prior to radical prostatectomy:: Experienced versus less experienced readers
    Fütterer, JJ
    Engelbrecht, MR
    Huisman, HJ
    Jager, GJ
    Hulsbergen-van De Kaa, CA
    Witjes, JA
    Barentsz, JO
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2005, 237 (02) : 541 - 549
  • [9] Diffusion imaging of the prostate at 3.0 tesla
    Gibbs, P
    Pickles, MD
    Turnbull, LW
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2006, 41 (02) : 185 - 188
  • [10] Comparison of quantitative T2 mapping and diflusion-weighted imaging in the normal and pathologic prostate
    Gibbs, P
    Tozer, DJ
    Liney, GP
    Turnbull, LW
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2001, 46 (06) : 1054 - 1058