The groningen longitudinal glaucoma study III. The predictive value of frequency-doubling perimetry and GDx nerve fibre analyser test results for the development of glaucomatous visual field loss

被引:13
作者
Heeg, G. P. [1 ]
Jansonius, N. M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Ophthalmol, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
glaucoma; glaucoma suspect; FDT; GDx; scanning laser polarimetry; perimetry; WAVELENGTH AUTOMATED PERIMETRY; TECHNOLOGY PERIMETRY; SPECIFICITY; SENSITIVITY; STANDARD; DEFECTS; AGE;
D O I
10.1038/eye.2008.348
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose To investigate whether frequency-doubling perimetry (FDT) and nerve fibre analyser (GDx) test results are able to predict glaucomatous visual field loss in glaucoma suspect patients. Methods A large cohort of glaucoma suspect patients (patients with ocular hypertension or a positive family history of glaucoma without visual field abnormalities at baseline) was followed prospectively for 4 years with SAP (HFA 30-2 SITA fast), FDT (C-20 full threshold), and GDx (version 2.010) in a clinical setting. After the follow-up period, baseline FDT and GDx test results of converters (glaucoma suspect patients who had converted to a reproducible abnormal SAP test result during follow-up) were compared to that of non-converters (suspects with normal SAP test results at the end of the follow-up) by calculating relative risks. Cutoff point for FDT was >1 depressed test point P<0.01 in the total deviation probability plot; cutoff point for GDx was the number >29. Results Of 174 glaucoma suspect patients, 26 had developed reproducible glaucomatous visual field loss (conversion rate: 3.7% per year). Relative risk was 1.8 (95% confidence interval: 0.9-3.7; P = 0.10) for FDT and 2.7 (95% confidence interval: 1.2-6.3; P = 0.01) for GDx. Positive predictive value was 0.22 for both FDT and GDx; negative predictive value was 0.88 for FDT and 0.92 for GDx. Conclusions In a clinical setting, especially GDx may be helpful for identifying glaucoma suspect patients at risk of developing glaucomatous visual field loss as assessed by SAP. Eye (2009) 23, 1647-1652; doi: 10.1038/eye.2008.348; published online 14 November 2008
引用
收藏
页码:1647 / 1652
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects [J].
Budenz, DL ;
Rhee, P ;
Feuer, WJ ;
McSoley, J ;
Johnson, CA ;
Anderson, DR .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 109 (06) :1052-1058
[2]   Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss [J].
Cello, KE ;
Nelson-Quigg, JM ;
Johnson, CA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 129 (03) :314-322
[3]   Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, SITA Standard and SITA Fast perimetry in perimetrically inexperienced individuals [J].
de Tarso Ponte Pierre-Filho, Paulo ;
Schimiti, Rui Barroso ;
Cabral de Vasconcellos, Jose Paulo ;
Costa, Vital Paulino .
ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2006, 84 (03) :345-350
[4]   Automated perimetry - A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology [J].
Delgado, MF ;
Nguyen, NTA ;
Cox, TA ;
Singh, K ;
Lee, DA ;
Dueker, DK ;
Fechtner, RD ;
Juzych, MS ;
Lin, SC ;
Netland, PA ;
Pastor, SA ;
Schuman, JS ;
Samples, JR .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 109 (12) :2362-2374
[5]   Influence of test reliability on the screening performance of frequency-doubling perimetry [J].
Heeg, GP ;
Jansonius, NM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 141 (03) :585-587
[6]   The Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study. I. Baseline sensitivity and specificity of the frequency doubling perimeter and the GDx nerve fibre analyser [J].
Heeg, GP ;
Blanksma, LJ ;
Hardus, PLLJ ;
Jansonius, NM .
ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2005, 83 (01) :46-52
[7]   Learning effect, normal range, and test-retest variability of Frequency Doubling Perimetry as a function of age, perimetric experience, and the presence or absence of glaucoma [J].
Heeg, GP ;
Ponsioen, TL ;
Jansonius, NM .
OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2003, 23 (06) :535-540
[8]  
JANSONIUS NM, 2008, ACTA OPHTHALMOL JUL
[9]   Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. Criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) [J].
Johnson, CA ;
Sample, PA ;
Cioffi, GA ;
Liebmann, JR ;
Weinreb, RN .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 134 (02) :177-185
[10]   Prediction of visual field defects on standard automated perimetry by screening C-20-1 frequency doubling technology perimetry [J].
Kamantigue, MEG ;
Joson, PJ ;
Chen, PP .
JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2006, 15 (01) :35-39