Housing, ease of handling and minimising inter-pig aggression at mixing for nursery to finishing pigs as reported in a survey of North American pork producers

被引:9
作者
Ison, S. H. [1 ]
Bates, R. O. [1 ]
Ernst, C. W. [1 ]
Steibe, J. P. [1 ]
Siegford, J. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, 474 S Shaw Lane,Room 1290, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Aggression; Farmers; Perception; Pig; Survey; UNFAMILIAR ADULT-PIGS; ANIMAL-WELFARE; AGONISTIC BEHAVIOR; UNACQUAINTED PIGS; DOMESTIC PIGS; SOCIAL-GROUPS; PIGLETS; SOWS; PERFORMANCE; ENRICHMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.applanim.2018.05.004
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Inter-pig aggression is a welfare issue that has undergone extensive research. Although management techniques have proven useful in minimising aggression in research settings, it is not known how often these are used on farm. One objective of an online survey of North American pork producers was to learn about the housing, ease of handling, and management of nursery to finishing pigs, including what techniques were used to minimise aggression, how useful they were perceived to be and what were potential barriers to their use. Respondents were given a list of techniques to select which ones they used, and indicate how useful they perceived them to be on a five-point scale ('very useful' to 'not useful at all'). A step-wise binomial logistic regression was used to analyse the association between other factors and whether or not respondents reported that at least one technique was used. Respondents (n = 298), had nursery (11,604 4032, range: 1-950,000) and/or finishing pigs (18,999 5789, range: 2-1,500,000), or did not currently have pigs but answered the questions, at the time the survey was completed. Some had pigs of both stages (n = 181), and some had just nursery (n = 24), or finishing (n = 89) pigs. When asked if they regularly re-grouped unfamiliar pigs, 36% of all respondents selected yes (33% at nursery, 25% at finishing). Of all respondents, 53% reported using at least one technique to minimise regrouping aggression. Techniques reported from most to least useful included: pre-weaning piglet socialisation (n = 19), using mixed weight pens (n = 9), night-time mixing (n = 50), mixing all pigs to a new pen (n = 108), barriers (n = 25), using specific mixing pens (n = 21), odour masking agents (n = 38), pre-exposure in a neighbouring pen (n = 45), and enrichment devices (n = 41). After stepwise selection, the best regression model for predicting the odds of using at least one technique included the factor pig stage (nursery, finisher, or both), as farms specialising in either nursery (P < 0.001) or finishing pigs (P < 0.001) only, had increased log odds of using a technique. Those that did not mix regularly had reduced odds (P < 0.001) of using a technique, and those that used bedding tended to have increased odds of using a technique (P = 0.08). Overall, producers avoided mixing unfamiliar pigs, but for systems in which regular mixing was used, techniques were more likely to be implemented to help minimise aggression. However, over a third of respondents who reported that they did not regularly mix at any stage, still indicated that they used at least one technique.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 166
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] The effect of experience of handling on pigs' willingness to move
    Abbott, TA
    Hunter, EJ
    Guise, HJ
    Penny, RHC
    [J]. APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1997, 54 (04) : 371 - 375
  • [2] The effects of weight asymmetry and resource distribution on aggression in groups of unacquainted pigs
    Andersen, IL
    Andenæs, H
    Boe, KE
    Jensen, P
    Bakken, M
    [J]. APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2000, 68 (02) : 107 - 120
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2012, 2012 Census of Agriculture - State Data, P464, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1009556802759
  • [4] Factors influencing aggression between sows after mixing and the consequences for welfare and production
    Arey, DS
    Edwards, SA
    [J]. LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1998, 56 (01): : 61 - 70
  • [5] EFFECTS OF CHEMICAL INTERVENTION TECHNIQUES ON AGGRESSION AND INJURIES WHEN GROUPING UNFAMILIAR ADULT-PIGS
    BARNETT, JL
    CRONIN, GM
    MCCALLUM, TH
    NEWMAN, EA
    [J]. APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1993, 36 (2-3) : 135 - 148
  • [6] EFFECTS OF PEN SIZE, PARTIAL STALLS AND METHOD OF FEEDING ON WELFARE-RELATED BEHAVIORAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL-RESPONSES OF GROUP-HOUSED PIGS
    BARNETT, JL
    HEMSWORTH, PH
    CRONIN, GM
    NEWMAN, EA
    MCCALLUM, TH
    CHILTON, D
    [J]. APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1992, 34 (03) : 207 - 220
  • [7] Effects of grouping unfamiliar adult pigs after dark, after treatment with amperozide and by using pens with stalls, on aggression, skin lesions and plasma cortisol concentrations
    Barnett, JL
    Cronin, GM
    McCallum, TH
    Newman, EA
    Hennessy, DP
    [J]. APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1996, 50 (02) : 121 - 133
  • [8] Expert judgement on enrichment materials for pigs validates preliminary RICHPIG model
    Bracke, Marc B. M.
    Zonderland, Johan J.
    Bleumer, Edwin J. B.
    [J]. APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2007, 104 (1-2) : 1 - 13
  • [9] Persistency of the piglet's reactivity to the handler following a previous positive or negative experience
    Brajon, Sophie
    Laforest, Jean-Paul
    Bergeron, Renee
    Tallet, Celine
    Hoetzel, Maria-Jose
    Devillers, Nicolas
    [J]. APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2015, 162 : 9 - 19
  • [10] Farmers' perception of aggression between growing pigs
    Camerlink, Irene
    Turner, Simon P.
    [J]. APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2017, 192 : 42 - 47