In vitro ultrasound experiments: Standing wave and multiple reflections influence on the outcome

被引:41
作者
Secomski, Wojciech [1 ]
Bilmin, Krzysztof [2 ]
Kujawska, Tamara [1 ]
Nowicki, Andrzej [1 ]
Grieb, Pawel [2 ]
Lewin, Peter A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Polish Acad Sci, Inst Fundamental Technol Res, Pawinskiego 5b, PL-02106 Warsaw, Poland
[2] Polish Acad Sci, Mossakowski Med Res Ctr, Pawinskiego 5, PL-02106 Warsaw, Poland
[3] Drexel Univ, Sch Biomed Engn, Sci & Hlth Syst, 3141 Chestnut St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Standing wave; Ultrasound pressure; Ultrasound intensity; C6; glioma; Anticancer therapy; Sonodynamic therapy; Ultrasound bio-effects; C6; GLIOMA-CELLS; SONODYNAMIC THERAPY; FOCUSED ULTRASOUND; CANCER-THERAPY; HEMATOPORPHYRIN; ENHANCEMENT; EXPOSURE; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultras.2017.02.008
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this work was to determine the influence of standing waves and possible multiple reflections under the conditions often encountered in examining the effects of ultrasound exposure on the cell cultures in vitro. More specifically, the goal was to quantitatively ascertain the influence of ultrasound exposure under free field (FF) and standing waves (SW) and multiple reflections (MR) conditions (SWMR) on the biological endpoint (50% cell necrosis). Such information would help in designing the experiments, in which the geometry of the container with biological tissue may prevent FF conditions to be established and in which the ultrasound generated temperature elevation is undesirable. This goal was accomplished by performing systematic, side-by-side experiments in vitro with C6 rat glioma cancer cells using 12 well and 96 well plates. It was determined that to obtain 50% of cell viability using the 12 well plates, the spatial average, temporal average (Ism) intensities of 0.32 W/cm(2) and 5.89 W/cm(2) were needed under SWMR and FF conditions, respectively. For 96 well plates the results were 0.80 W/cm(2) and 2.86 W/cm(2) respectively. The corresponding, hydrophone measured pRms maximum pressure amplitude values, were 0.71 MPa, 0.75 MPa, 0.75 MPa and 0.73 MPa, respectively. These results suggest that pRms pressure amplitude was independent of the measurement set-up geometry and hence could be used to predict the cells' mortality threshold under any in vitro experimental conditions or even as a starting point for (pre-clinical) in vivo tests. The described procedure of the hydrophone measurements of the PRms maximum pressure amplitude at the 42 distance (here 0.75 mm) from the cell's level at the bottom of the dish or plate provides the guideline allowing the difference between the FF and SWMR conditions to be determined in any experimental setup. The outcome of the measurements also indicates that SWMR exposure might be useful at any ultrasound assisted therapy experiments as it permits to reduce thermal effects. Although the results presented are valid for the experimental conditions used in this study they can be generalized. The analysis developed provides methodology facilitating independent laboratories to determine their specific ultrasound exposure parameters for a given biological end-point under standing waves and multiple reflections conditions. The analysis also permits verification of the outcome of the experiments mimicking pre- and clinical environment between different, unaffiliated teams of researchers. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 213
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [21] Enhancement of ultrasonically induced cell damage by phthalocyanines in vitro
    Milowska, Katarzyna
    Gabryelak, Teresa
    [J]. ULTRASONICS, 2008, 48 (08) : 724 - 730
  • [22] Nonaka M, 2009, ANTICANCER RES, V29, P943
  • [23] The impact of standing wave effects on transcranial focused ultrasound disruption of the blood-brain barrier in a rat model
    O'Reilly, Meaghan A.
    Huang, Yuexi
    Hynynen, Kullervo
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (18) : 5251 - 5267
  • [24] Attenuation, scattering, and absorption of ultrasound in the skull bone
    Pinton, Gianmarco
    Aubry, Jean-Francois
    Bossy, Emmanuel
    Muller, Marie
    Pernot, Mathieu
    Tanter, Mickael
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (01) : 299 - 307
  • [25] Someda C., 2006, ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE, P269
  • [26] Sonodynamic therapy
    Tachibana, Katsuro
    Feril, Loreto B., Jr.
    Ikeda-Dantsuji, Yurika
    [J]. ULTRASONICS, 2008, 48 (04) : 253 - 259
  • [27] Tumor growth inhibition by sonodynamic therapy using a novel sonosensitizer
    Tsuru, Hirofumi
    Shibaguchi, Hirotomo
    Kuroki, Motomu
    Yamashita, Yuichi
    Kuroki, Masahide
    [J]. FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2012, 53 (03) : 464 - 472
  • [28] A REVIEW OF LOW-INTENSITY ULTRASOUND FOR CANCER THERAPY
    Wood, Andrew K. W.
    Sehgal, Chandra M.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 41 (04) : 905 - 928
  • [29] Sonodynamic therapy using water-dispersed TiO2-polyethylene glycol compound on glioma cells: Comparison of cytotoxic mechanism with photodynamic therapy
    Yamaguchi, Shigeru
    Kobayashi, Hiroyuki
    Narita, Takuhito
    Kanehira, Koki
    Sonezaki, Shuji
    Kudo, Nobuki
    Kubota, Yoshinobu
    Terasaka, Shunsuke
    Houkin, Kiyohiro
    [J]. ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY, 2011, 18 (05) : 1197 - 1204
  • [30] HEMATOPORPHYRIN AS A SENSITIZER OF CELL-DAMAGING EFFECT OF ULTRASOUND
    YUMITA, N
    NISHIGAKI, R
    UMEMURA, K
    UMEMURA, S
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 1989, 80 (03): : 219 - 222