Quality analysis of DCGAN-generated mammography lesions

被引:7
作者
Alyafi, Basel [1 ]
Diaz, Oliver [2 ]
Elangovan, Premkumar [3 ]
Vilanova, Joan C. [4 ]
del Riego, Javier [5 ]
Marti, Robert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Girona, Comp Vis & Robot Inst, Girona, Spain
[2] Univ Barcelona, Dept Math & Comp Sci, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Royal Surrey Cty Hosp, Natl Coordinating Ctr Phys Mammog, Guildford GU2 7XX, Surrey, England
[4] Univ Girona, Fac Med, Girona, Spain
[5] Parc Tauli Hosp Univ, UDIAT Ctr Diagnost, Dept Radiol, Inst Invest Parc Tauli I3PT, Barcelona, Spain
来源
15TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON BREAST IMAGING (IWBI2020) | 2020年 / 11513卷
关键词
breast lesions; image synthesis; GANs; t-SNE; ROC curve; observer study; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1117/12.2560473
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Medical image synthesis has gained a great focus recently, especially after the introduction of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs). GANs have been used widely to provide anatomically-plausible and diverse samples for augmentation and other applications, including segmentation and super resolution. In our previous work, Deep Convolutional GANs were used to generate synthetic mammogram lesions, masses mainly, that could enhance the classification performance in imbalanced datasets. In this new work, a deeper investigation was carried out to explore other aspects of the generated images evaluation, i.e., realism, feature space distribution, and observer studies. t-Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) was used to reduce the dimensionality of real and fake images to enable 2D visualisations. Additionally, two expert radiologists performed a realism-evaluation study. Visualisations showed that the generated images have a similar feature distribution of the real ones, avoiding outliers. Moreover, the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) study showed that the radiologists could not, in many cases, distinguish between synthetic and real lesions, giving accuracies between 51% and 59% using a balanced sample set.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Alyafi B., 2020, MED IMAGING 2020 COM
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2018, ARXIV181010850
  • [3] End-to-End Adversarial Retinal Image Synthesis
    Costa, Pedro
    Galdran, Adrian
    Meyer, Maria Ines
    Niemeijer, Meindert
    Abramoff, Michael
    Mendonca, Ana Maria
    Campilho, Aurelio
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2018, 37 (03) : 781 - 791
  • [4] Design and validation of realistic breast models for use in multiple alternative forced choice virtual clinical trials
    Elangovan, Premkumar
    Mackenzie, Alistair
    Dance, David R.
    Young, Kenneth C.
    Cooke, Victoria
    Wilkinson, Louise
    Given-Wilson, Rosalind M.
    Wallis, Matthew G.
    Wells, Kevin
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2017, 62 (07) : 2778 - 2794
  • [5] Simulation and Synthesis in Medical Imaging
    Frangi, Alejandro F.
    Tsaftaris, Sotirios A.
    Prince, Jerry L.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2018, 37 (03) : 673 - 679
  • [6] GAN-based synthetic medical image augmentation for increased CNN performance in liver lesion classification
    Frid-Adar, Maayan
    Diamant, Idit
    Klang, Eyal
    Amitai, Michal
    Goldberger, Jacob
    Greenspan, Hayit
    [J]. NEUROCOMPUTING, 2018, 321 : 321 - 331
  • [7] Goodfellow IJ, 2014, ADV NEUR IN, V27, P2672
  • [8] Detection of microcalcification clusters by 2D-mammography and narrow and wide angle digital breast tomosynthesis
    Hadjipanteli, Andria
    Elangovan, Premkumar
    Looney, Padraig T.
    Mackenzie, Alistair
    Wells, Kevin
    Dance, David R.
    Young, Kenneth C.
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2016: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2016, 9783
  • [9] The Oncology Medical Image Database (OMI-DB)
    Halling-Brown, M. D.
    Looney, P. T.
    Patel, M. N.
    Warren, L. M.
    Mackenzie, A.
    Young, K. C.
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2014: PACS AND IMAGING INFORMATICS: NEXT GENERATION AND INNOVATIONS, 2014, 9039
  • [10] Radford A., 2016, 2016 INT C LEARN REP