Psychosocial and economic impacts of a charge in lightweight plastic carrier bags in Portugal: Keep calm and carry on?

被引:14
作者
Luis, Silvia [1 ,2 ]
Roseta-Palma, Catarina [3 ]
Matos, Marta [1 ]
Lima, Maria Luisa [1 ]
Sousa, Catia [4 ]
机构
[1] Inst Univ Lisboa Iscte, Ctr Invest & Intervencao Social CIS IUL, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Lisbon, Ctr Adm & Polit Publ CAPP, Inst Super Ciencias Socials & Polit ISCSP, Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Inst Univ Lisboa Iscte, Business Res Unit BRU IUL, Lisbon, Portugal
[4] Univ Lusofona Humanidades & Tecnol, Ctr Invest Polit Econ & Soc, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
charge; lightweight plastic bag; psychosocial impacts; economic impacts; TAX;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104962
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Reducing plastic waste has become an urgent global challenge. To help fight this problem, European countries have undertaken the mission to reduce lightweight plastic bag consumption. In 2014, Portugal implemented a charge on lightweight plastic bags, calling for an adjustment from both consumers and firms. The present research aims to study the psychosocial and economic impacts of this tax measure, namely in terms of acceptability of the measure, potential attitude and behaviour changes, and impact on plastic bag markets. The psychosocial impacts were studied based on an online survey (N = 198) and on available datasets illustrating societal trends. Survey results showed that participants agreed with the charge and with widening it to all types of plastic bags. They attributed environmental motives to its implementation, developed reuse habits and mentioned a decreased consumption of disposable plastics. In addition, individuals appear more concerned with the impacts of everyday plastic products in the environment, and more willing to pay higher taxes and prices to protect the environment. The economic impacts were studied using available data on the charge revenue and on the production and sales of plastic bags, among others. We illustrate that the implementation of the charge led to a sharp fall in the use of lightweight bags, generating a decrease in the production and sale of plastic bags overall, while avoiding significant impacts on the relevant economic sectors.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Recycling and recovery routes of plastic solid waste (PSW): A review [J].
Al-Salem, S. M. ;
Lettieri, P. ;
Baeyens, J. .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2009, 29 (10) :2625-2643
[2]  
[Anonymous], Special Eurobarometer, P416, DOI [10.2779/25662, DOI 10.2779/25662, https://doi.org/10.2779/25662]
[3]  
CHAMBERS R. L., 2003, Analysis of Survey Data
[4]   The most popular tax in Europe? Lessons from the Irish plastic bags levy [J].
Convery, Frank ;
McDonnell, Simon ;
Ferreira, Susana .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2007, 38 (01) :1-11
[5]  
European Commission, 2018, EUROPEAN STRATEGY PL
[6]  
European Commission, 2017, BREAK BAG HAB
[7]  
Fernandes A C., 2017, Relatorio do Estado do Ambiente 2017
[8]   Towards parsimony in habit measurement: Testing the convergent and predictive validity of an automaticity subscale of the Self-Report Habit Index [J].
Gardner, Benjamin ;
Abraham, Charles ;
Lally, Phillippa ;
de Bruijn, Gert-Jan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2012, 9
[9]   Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made [J].
Geyer, Roland ;
Jambeck, Jenna R. ;
Law, Kara Lavender .
SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2017, 3 (07)
[10]  
GHK, 2007, ASS BEN EFF PLAST SH