Chitosan enhanced coagulation of algal turbid waters - Comparison between rapid mix and ultrasound coagulation methods

被引:40
作者
Fast, Sara Ann [1 ]
Kokabian, Bahareh [1 ]
Gude, Veera Gnaneswar [1 ]
机构
[1] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
基金
美国国家环境保护局;
关键词
Algae; Chitosan; Ultrasound; Flocculation; Sedimentation; Rapid mix; ULTRAFILTRATION UF; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.cej.2014.01.081
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Presence of algae is considered as an undesirable water pollutant in drinking water sources such as reservoirs and at water and wastewater treatment plants causing odor, taste and other severe health issues. In this study, ultrasound-chitosan enhanced coagulation/flocculation process for treating algal turbid water was developed. The possibility of performing ultrasound mixing in lieu of conventional rapid mixing was evaluated. The effects of several process parameters such as chemical dosages, pH, ultrasound exposure time, concentration factors and flocculation and sedimentation times were studied. Two comparative studies, i.e., a comparison between ultrasound-alum and ultrasound-chitosan flocculation of algal turbid waters as well as a comparison with conventional rapid mix and direct flocculation were conducted. The results from this study reveal that ultrasound enhanced method can produce clear supernatant water with greater than 98% turbidity reduction. A power density of 0.1-0.25 W/mL was sufficient to provide adequate mixing for chemical distribution and pin-floc formation. The concentration factor for ultrasound-enhanced coagulation/flocculation was determined to be 30 with an optimum ultrasound exposure of 1 min followed by a 20 min flocculation process. This study confirms that ultrasound-chitosan enhanced flocculation process may provide additional benefits for algal cell harvesting compared to the conventional rapid mix method. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 410
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Optimization of microalgae coagulation process using chitosan [J].
Ahmad, A. L. ;
Yasin, N. H. Mat ;
Derek, C. J. C. ;
Lim, J. K. .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2011, 173 (03) :879-882
[2]   Chemical pretreatment for reduction of membrane fouling caused by algae [J].
Babel, Sandhya ;
Takizawa, Satoshi .
DESALINATION, 2011, 274 (1-3) :171-176
[3]  
Benefield L.D., 1982, PROCESS CHEM WATER W
[4]  
Blair M.F., 2013, J ENV CHEM ENG
[5]   Investigating submerged ultrafiltration (UF) and microfiltration (MF) membranes for seawater pre-treatment dedicated to total removal of undesirable micro-algae [J].
Castaing, J. -B. ;
Masse, A. ;
Pontie, M. ;
Sechet, V. ;
Haure, J. ;
Jaouen, P. .
DESALINATION, 2010, 253 (1-3) :71-77
[6]   Evaluation of process parameters of ultrasonic treatment of bacterial suspensions in a pilot scale water disinfection system [J].
Hulsmans, Ann ;
Joris, Koen ;
Lambert, Nico ;
Rediers, Hans ;
Declerck, Priscilla ;
Delaedt, Yasmine ;
Ollevier, Frans ;
Liers, Sven .
ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY, 2010, 17 (06) :1004-1009
[7]   Comparison of algal removal by coagulation with clays and Al-based coagulants [J].
Jiang, Jia-Qian ;
Kim, C. G. .
SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 43 (07) :1677-1686
[8]   High power ultrasonics in pyrometallurgy: Current status and recent development [J].
Komarov, SV ;
Kuwabara, M ;
Abramov, OV .
ISIJ INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 45 (12) :1765-1782
[9]  
Kumar MNVR, 2000, REACT FUNCT POLYM, V46, P1
[10]  
Meegan G. D., 2001, J ACOUST COM, V110, P2676