Evaluation of kV-CBCT based 3D dose calculation accuracy and its validation using delivery fluence derived dose metrics in Head and Neck Cancer

被引:3
作者
Shinde, Prashantkumar [1 ]
Jadhav, Anand [2 ]
Shankar, V. [3 ]
Gupta, Karan Kumar [4 ]
Dhoble, Nirupama S. [5 ]
Dhoble, Sanjay [1 ]
机构
[1] Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur Univ, Dept Phys, Nagpur 440033, India
[2] Sir HN Reliance Fdn Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Mumbai 400004, India
[3] Apollo Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chennai 600035, Tamil Nadu, India
[4] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Taipei, Taiwan
[5] Sevadal Mahila Mahavidhyalay, Dept Chem, Nagpur 440015, India
来源
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2022年 / 96卷
关键词
kV-CBCT; 3D dose reconstruction; Dosimetry; Head and Neck Cancer; CONE-BEAM CT; VOLUMETRIC-MODULATED ARC; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; RADIATION-THERAPY; ELECTRON-DENSITY; PASSING RATES; VMAT QA; IMRT; RECONSTRUCTION; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.02.014
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the dosimetric impact of Hounsfield unit (HU) variations in kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography (kV-CBCT) based 3D dose calculation accuracy in the treatment planning system and its validation using measured treatment delivery dose (MTDD) derived dose metrics for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) plans in Head and Neck (HN) Cancer. Methods: CBCT dose calculation accuracy was evaluated for 8 VMAT plans on inhomogeneous phantom and 40 VMAT and IMRT plans of HN Cancer patients and validated using ArcCHECK diode array MTDD derived 3D dose metric on CT and CBCT. Results: The mean percentage dose difference between CBCT and CT in TPS (Delta D(CBCT-CT)(TPS)) and 3DVH (Delta D (CBCT-CT)3DVH) were compared for the corresponding evaluation dose metrics (D-98%, D-95%, D-50%, D-2%, D-max, D-1cc, D-0.03cc, D-mean) of all PTVs and OARs in phantom and patients. Delta D(CBCT-CT)(TPS) and Delta D(CBCT-CT)(3DVH) for all evaluation dose points of all PTVs and OARs were less than 2.55% in phantom and 2.4% in HN patients. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between Delta D(CBCT-CT)(TPS) and Delta D(CBCT-CT)(3DVH) for all dose points in all PTVs and OARs showed a strong to moderate correlation in phantom and patients with p < 0.001. Conclusions: This study evaluated and validated the potential feasibility of kV-CBCT for treatment plan 3D dose reconstruction in clinical decision making for Adaptive radiotherapy on CT in Head and Neck cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 45
页数:14
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Monitoring daily MLC positional errors using trajectory log files and EPID measurements for IMRT and VMAT deliveries
    Agnew, A.
    Agnew, C. E.
    Grattan, M. W. D.
    Hounsell, A. R.
    McGarry, C. K.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2014, 59 (09) : N49 - N63
  • [2] Correlation of phantom-based and log file patient-specific QA with complexity scores for VMAT
    Agnew, Christina E.
    Irvine, Denise M.
    McGarry, Conor K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 15 (06): : 204 - 216
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, PHANTOM LAB CATPHAN
  • [4] Comparison of CBCT-based dose calculation methods in head and neck cancer radiotherapy: from Hounsfield unit to density calibration curve to deep learning
    Barateau, Anais
    De Crevoisier, Renaud
    Largent, Axel
    Mylona, Eugenia
    Perichon, Nicolas
    Castelli, Joel
    Chajon, Enrique
    Acosta, Oscar
    Simon, Antoine
    Nunes, Jean-Claude
    Lafond, Caroline
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (10) : 4683 - 4693
  • [5] Dose calculation accuracy of different image value to density tables for cone-beam CT planning in head & neck and pelvic localizations
    Barateau, Anais
    Garlopeau, Christopher
    Cugny, Audrey
    De Figueiredo, Benedicte Henriques
    Dupin, Charles
    Caron, Jerome
    Antoine, Mikael
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 31 (02): : 146 - 151
  • [6] Quantification of volumetric and geometric changes occurring during fractionated radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer using an integrated CT/linear accelerator system
    Barker, JL
    Garden, AS
    Ang, KK
    O'Daniel, JC
    Wang, H
    Court, LE
    Morrison, WH
    Rosenthal, DI
    Chao, KSC
    Tucker, SL
    Mohan, R
    Dong, L
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 59 (04): : 960 - 970
  • [7] Boda-Heggemann J, 2011, STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, V187, P284, DOI 10.1007/s00066-011-2236-4
  • [8] IMRT: a review and preview
    Bortfeld, Thomas
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2006, 51 (13) : R363 - R379
  • [9] Feasibility of CBCT-based dose with a patient-specific stepwise HU-to-density curve to determine time of replanning
    Chen, Shifeng
    Le, Quynh
    Mutaf, Yildirim
    Lu, Wei
    Nichols, Elizabeth M.
    Yi, Byong Yong
    Leven, Tish
    Prado, Karl L.
    D'Souza, Warren D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 18 (05): : 64 - 69
  • [10] EPID-based 3D dosimetry for pre-treatment FFF VMAT stereotactic body radiotherapy plan verification using dosimetry Check™
    Chendi, Agnese
    Botti, Andrea
    Orlandi, Matteo
    Sghedoni, Roberto
    Iori, Mauro
    Cagni, Elisabetta
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 81 : 227 - 236