Approaches to group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations based on multiplicative consistency

被引:70
作者
Jin, Feifei [1 ,2 ]
Ni, Zhiwei [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Huayou [3 ]
Li, Yaping [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Management, Hefei 230009, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Educ, ICey Lab Proc Optimizat & Intelligent Decis Makin, Hefei 230009, Anhui, Peoples R China
[3] Anhui Univ, Sch Math Sci, Hefei 230601, Anhui, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Group decision making; Intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation; Order consistency; Multiplicative consistency; Weak transitivity; WEIGHTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.knosys.2016.01.017
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation (IFPR) was introduced by Xu to efficiently deal with situations in which the decision makers (DMs) exhibit the characteristics of affirmation, negation and hesitation for the preference degrees over paired comparisons of alternatives. In this paper, two new approaches to group decision making (GDM) are proposed to derive the normalized intuitionistic fuzzy priority weights from IFPRs based on the order consistency and the multiplicative consistency. First, the concepts of order consistency and weak transitivity for IFPRs are introduced, and followed by a discussion of their desirable properties. Then, in order to convert the normalized intuitionistic fuzzy priority weights into multiplicative consistent IFPR, a transformation approach is investigated. Two linear optimization models are further developed to derive the normalized intuitionistic fuzzy weight vector for both individual and group IFPRs with the principle of minimizing the deviations between any provided IFPR and the converted multiplicative consistent IFPR, and the optimal deviation values obtained from the models enable us to improve the multiplicative consistency of IFPRs. Finally, based on the order consistency and the multiplicative consistency, two new algorithms for GDM are presented. Several numerical examples are provided, and comparative analyses with existing approaches are performed to demonstrate that the proposed methods are both valid and practical to deal with group decision making problems. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 59
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Alonso S, 2004, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V3131, P227
[2]   MORE ON INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS [J].
ATANASSOV, KT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1989, 33 (01) :37-45
[3]   INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS [J].
ATANASSOV, KT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1986, 20 (01) :87-96
[4]   Group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations [J].
Behret, Hulya .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2014, 70 :33-43
[5]   Group decision making using incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on the additive consistency and the order consistency [J].
Chen, Shyi-Ming ;
Lin, Tsung-En ;
Lee, Li-Wei .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2014, 259 :1-15
[6]   Cardinal Consistency of Reciprocal Preference Relations: A Characterization of Multiplicative Transitivity [J].
Chiclana, Francisco ;
Herrera-Viedma, Enrique ;
Alonso, Sergio ;
Herrera, Francisco .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2009, 17 (01) :14-23
[7]   The optimal priority models of the intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation and their application in selecting industries with higher meteorological sensitivity [J].
Gong, Zai-Wu ;
Li, Lian-Shui ;
Forrest, Jeffrey ;
Zhao, Yue .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (04) :4394-4402
[8]   Goal programming approaches to obtain the priority vectors from the intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations [J].
Gong, Zai-Wu ;
Li, Lian-Shui ;
Zhou, Fei-Xue ;
Yao, Tian-Xiang .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 57 (04) :1187-1193
[9]   Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making [J].
Herrera, F ;
Martínez, L ;
Sánchez, PJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2005, 166 (01) :115-132
[10]   Multiperson decision-making based on multiplicative preference relations [J].
Herrera, F ;
Herrera-Viedma, E ;
Chiclana, F .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2001, 129 (02) :372-385