Impact of incidental bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in a family member on breast cancer risk assessment: Clinical considerations

被引:0
作者
Salant, Talya
Lauderdale, Diane S.
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Pritzker Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Hlth Studies, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
来源
CANCER DETECTION AND PREVENTION | 2006年 / 30卷 / 04期
关键词
adult; breast neoplasms/prevention & control; risk assessment; models; statistical; women's health; hysterectomy; risk prediction; family cancer history; first-degree relative; second-degree relative; MRI screening; tamoxifen;
D O I
10.1016/j.cdp.2006.06.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Hysterectomy (TAH/TVH) with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) remains prevalent in the general population; however, current risk tools do not account for the potential impact of BSO on breast cancer risk calculations in family members. Methods: CancerGene (c) software was used to estimate the effect of BSO in a family member on proband risk across a range of simulated family cancer histories. Results: Impact of BSO on proband risk appears most salient when it occurs in a first-degree relative. Race appears to modify the attainment of clinically significant risk thresholds, suggesting possible systematic risk underestimations among black women. Conclusions: When clinicians calculate risk in families where a close relative had BSO, they may choose to supplement standard risk calculations with numerical ranges of risk that account for the risk-reducing effect of BSO. More consideration is needed of whether failing to account for BSO in risk models perpetuates race-based health disparities. (c) 2006 International Society for Preventive Oncology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 332
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Adams-Campbell L, 2004, J CLIN ONCOL, V22, p101S
[2]  
Bondy Melissa L., 2003, Cancer, V97, P230, DOI 10.1002/cncr.11018
[3]   Surgical risk reduction: Prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy and prophylactic mastectomy [J].
Dowdy, SC ;
Stefanek, M ;
Hartmann, LC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (04) :1113-1123
[4]   Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1990-1997 [J].
Farquhar, CM ;
Steiner, CA .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 99 (02) :229-234
[5]  
Hartman AR, 2005, RECENT RESULTS CANC, V166, P125
[6]  
Keshavarz Homa, 2002, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V51, P1
[7]   MRI screening for breast cancer in women with familial or genetic predisposition: Design of the Dutch National Study (MRISC) [J].
Kriege M. ;
Brekelmans C.T.M. ;
Boetes C. ;
Rutgers E.J.T. ;
Oosterwijk J.C. ;
Tollenaar R.A.E.M. ;
Manoliu R.A. ;
Holland R. ;
De Koning H.J. ;
Klijn J.G.M. .
Familial Cancer, 2001, 1 (3-4) :163-168
[8]   Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition [J].
Kriege, M ;
Brekelmans, CTM ;
Boetes, C ;
Besnard, PE ;
Zonderland, HM ;
Obdeijn, IM ;
Manoliu, RA ;
Kok, T ;
Peterse, H ;
Tilanus-Linthorst, MMA ;
Muller, SH ;
Meijer, S ;
Oosterwijk, JC ;
Beex, LVAM ;
Tollenaar, RAEM ;
de Koning, HJ ;
Rutgers, EJT ;
Klijn, JGM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (05) :427-437
[9]   Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer [J].
Kuhl, CK ;
Schrading, S ;
Leutner, CC ;
Morakkabati-Spitz, N ;
Wardelmann, E ;
Fimmers, R ;
Kuhn, W ;
Schild, HH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (33) :8469-8476
[10]  
Lepine L A, 1997, MMWR CDC Surveill Summ, V46, P1