Limitations of insulin resistance assessment in polycystic ovary syndrome

Background: Though insulin resistance (IR) is common in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), there is no agreement as to what surrogate method of assessment of IR is most reliable. Subjects and methods: In 478 women with PCOS, we compared methods based on fasting insulin and either fasting glucose (HOMA-IR and QUICKI) or triglycerides (McAuley Index) with IR indices derived from glucose and insulin during OGTT (Belfiore, Matsuda and Stumvoll indices). Results: There was a strong correlation between IR indices derived from fasting values HOMA-IR/QUICKI, r=-0.999, HOMA-IR/McAuley index, r =-0.849 and between all OGTT-derived IR indices (e.g.r =-0.876, for IRI/Matsuda, r =-0.808, for IRI/Stumvoll, and r=0.947, for Matsuda/Stumvoll index, P<0.001 for all), contrasting with a significant (P< 0.001), but highly variable correlation between IR indices derived from fasting vs OGTT-derived variables, ranging from r=-0.881 (HOMA-IR/Matsuda), through r=0.58, or r =-0.58 (IRI/HOMA-IR, IRI/QUICKI, respectively) to r=0.41 (QUICKI/Stumvoll), and r=0.386 for QUICKI/Matsuda indices Detailed comparison between HOMA-IR and IRI revealed that concordance between HOMA and IRI was poor for HOMA-IR/IRI values above 75th and 90th percentile For instance, only 53% (70/132) women with HOMA-IR >75th percentile had IRI value also above 75th percentile. There was a significant, but weak correlation of all IR indices with testosterone concentrations. Conclusions: Significant number of women with PCOS can be classified as being either insulin sensitive or insulin resistant depending on the method applied, as correlation between various IR indices is highly variable. Clinical application of surrogate indices for assessment of IR in PCOS must be therefore viewed with an extreme caution.