Contemporary trends in imaging test utilization for prostate cancer staging: Data from the cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor

被引:54
作者
Cooperberg, MR [1 ]
Lubeck, DP
Grossfeld, GD
Mehta, SS
Carroll, PR
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Urol Outcomes Res Grp, Program Urol Oncol, Dept Urol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Mt Zion Comprehens Canc Ctr, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] TAP Pharmaceut Prod Inc, Lake Forest, IL USA
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; neoplasm staging; radionuclide imaging; diagnostic imaging;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64665-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Previous investigators have reported widespread overuse of imaging tests for staging clinically localized prostate cancer. In this study imaging test utilization rates were analyzed in a contemporary group of patients, and clinical and demographic predictors of testing were identified. Materials and Methods: Data were abstracted from the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE), a longitudinal registry of men with various stages of prostate cancer. A total of 4,966 men met study inclusion criteria of available treatment and staging data. The rates of computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and bone scans performed between the dates of diagnosis and primary treatment were analyzed in patients at 3 levels of clinical risk based on serum prostate specific antigen, Gleason sum and T stage. Time trends in test utilization were analyzed by linear regression. Contemporary rates were compared with those identified in a previous analysis of an earlier CaPSURE cohort. Demographic and clinical predictors of utilization were identified using generalized linear model analysis. Results: Since June 1997, the overall use of staging tests has decreased 63%, 25.9% and 11.4% in patients at low, intermediate and high risk, respectively. The most precipitous decrease was noted for bone scan but the use of cross-sectional imaging also decreased in all groups. Utilization rates were lower in 2001 than in any other year studied in CaPSURE. Conclusions: The rates of testing decreased significantly in all risk groups. However, in the absence of established clinical practice guidelines many patients at low and intermediate risk continue to undergo unnecessary testing, while a growing number of those at high risk are proceeding to treatment without previous imaging.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 495
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
*AM UR ASS, 1995, REP MAN CLIN LOC PRO
[2]   Serum prostate-specific antigen as a predictor of staging abdominal/pelvic computed tomography in newly diagnosed prostate cancer [J].
Huncharek, M ;
Muscat, J .
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 1996, 21 (04) :364-367
[3]   Use of imaging tests for staging newly diagnosed prostate cancer: Trends from the CaPSURE database [J].
Kindrick, AV ;
Grossfeld, GD ;
Stier, DM ;
Flanders, SC ;
Henning, JM ;
Carroll, PR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (06) :2102-2106
[4]   ARE PELVIC COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY, BONE-SCAN AND PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY NECESSARY IN THE STAGING OF PROSTATIC-CANCER [J].
LEVRAN, Z ;
GONZALEZ, JA ;
DIOKNO, AC ;
JAFRI, SZH ;
STEINERT, BW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 75 (06) :778-781
[5]   The CaPSURE database: A methodology for clinical practice and research in prostate cancer [J].
Lubeck, DP ;
Litwin, MS ;
Henning, JM ;
Stier, DM ;
Mazonson, P ;
Fisk, R ;
Carroll, PR .
UROLOGY, 1996, 48 (05) :773-777
[6]   Update on the appropriate staging evaluation for newly diagnosed prostate cancer [J].
ODowd, GJ ;
Veltri, RW ;
Orozco, R ;
Miller, MC ;
Oesterling, JE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (03) :687-698
[7]  
OESTERLING JE, 1993, UROL CLIN N AM, V20, P705
[8]   Current trends in prostate cancer diagnosis and staging among United States urologists [J].
Plawker, MW ;
Fleisher, JM ;
Vapnek, EM ;
Macchia, RJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (05) :1853-1858
[9]   Prognostic significance of pathologic features in localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy: Implications for staging systems and predictive models [J].
Quinn, DI ;
Henshall, SM ;
Haynes, AM ;
Brenner, PC ;
Kooner, R ;
Golovsky, D ;
Mathews, J ;
O'Neill, GF ;
Turner, JJ ;
Delprado, W ;
Finlayson, JF ;
Sutherland, RL ;
Grygiel, JJ ;
Stricker, PD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (16) :3692-3705
[10]   Prediction of locoregional extension and metastatic disease in prostate cancer: a review [J].
Reckwitz, T ;
Potter, SR ;
Partin, AW .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 18 (03) :165-172