Efficacy of linezolid versus vancomycin in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus discitis -: A controlled animal model

被引:20
作者
Conaughty, Jason M.
Chen, Jack
Martinez, Octavio V.
Chiappetta, Gino
Brookfield, Kathleen F.
Eismont, Frank J.
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[2] St Josephs Hosp, Orange, CA USA
[3] Univ Miami, Miami, FL 33152 USA
关键词
linezolid; vancomycin; discitis; spine infections; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus;
D O I
10.1097/01.brs.0000241065.19723.13
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A rabbit model was used to assess the efficacy of linezolid and vancomycin for the treatment of discitis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Nontreated controls were used for comparison. Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine if there was a therapeutic difference between using linezolid and vancomycin in the treatment of MRSA discitis. Summary of Background Data. Vancomycin is currently the gold standard treatment for medical management of MRSA discitis. Linezolid is a relatively new drug that has been approved for treatment of MRSA infections, but currently there is no research demonstrating its efficacy at treating infections of the disc space. Methods. Twenty-four rabbits were inoculated with MRSA at two adjacent lumbar disc spaces via an anterior retroperitoneal approach. Six rabbits were to receive only pain medication and to serve as controls. Ten rabbits were assigned to a 5-day course of intravenous vancomycin, and 8 were assigned to a 5-day course of intravenous linezolid. Disc spaces were sent for quantitative culture after the 5-day treatment course. Results. The mean culture growth for the disc spaces was not statistically different between the linezolid treated group and the nontreated controls. While vancomycin treatment did lead to lower bacterial loads when compared with controls, the reduction was not statistically significant. When bacterial counts for the vancomycin group and linezolid group were compared, vancomycin treatment resulted in less bacterial growth. This difference was statistically significant. Conclusions. Linezolid is a clinically attractive alternative to vancomycin due to its mild side effect profile and oral bioavailability. However, in this MRSA discitis model with a short treatment course, vancomycin was superior to linezolid.
引用
收藏
页码:E830 / E832
页数:3
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Bartlett M, 2000, CTR DIS CONTROL NATL, V9, P4
[2]  
CURRIER BL, 1994, SPINE, V19, P2614
[3]   ANTIBIOTIC PENETRATION INTO RABBIT NUCLEUS PULPOSUS [J].
EISMONT, FJ ;
WIESEL, SW ;
BRIGHTON, CT ;
ROTHMAN, RH .
SPINE, 1987, 12 (03) :254-256
[4]   IATROGENIC DISCITIS - THE ROLE OF INTRAVENOUS ANTIBIOTICS IN PREVENTION AND TREATMENT - AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY [J].
FRASER, RD ;
OSTI, OL ;
VERNONROBERTS, B .
SPINE, 1989, 14 (09) :1025-1032
[5]   THE PENETRATION OF ANTIBIOTICS INTO THE NORMAL INTERVERTEBRAL-DISK [J].
GIBSON, MJ ;
KARPINSKI, MRK ;
SLACK, RCB ;
COWLISHAW, WA ;
WEBB, JK .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1987, 69 (05) :784-786
[6]   THE EFFECT OF PROPHYLACTIC ANTIBIOTICS ON IATROGENIC INTERVERTEBRAL DISC INFECTIONS - A RABBIT MODEL [J].
GUIBOUX, JP ;
CANTOR, JB ;
SMALL, SD ;
ZERVOS, M ;
HERKOWITZ, HN .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (06) :685-688
[7]   Highly reproducible bactericidal activity test results by using a modified national committee for clinical laboratory standards broth macrodilution technique [J].
Hacek, DM ;
Dressel, DC ;
Peterson, LR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 37 (06) :1881-1884
[8]   Efficacy and safety of linezolid in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections [J].
Hau, T .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2002, 21 (07) :491-498
[9]  
JOHNSON KD, 1986, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P281
[10]   Penetration of linezolid into bone, fat, muscle and haematoma of patients undergoing routine hip replacement [J].
Lovering, AM ;
Zhang, J ;
Bannister, GC ;
Lankester, BJA ;
Brown, JHM ;
Narendra, G ;
MacGowan, AP .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2002, 50 (01) :73-77