A secondary goal in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation: A "one home run is much better than two doubles" criterion

被引:29
作者
Davtalab-Olyaie, Mostafa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kashan, Fac Math Sci, Dept Appl Math, Kashan, Iran
关键词
Data envelopment analysis; cross-efficiency evaluation; MODELS; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1080/01605682.2018.1457482
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a mathematical programming approach for assessing the relative efficiency of decision making units (DMUs). The cross-efficiency evaluation is an extension of DEA that provides a ranking method and eliminates unrealistic DEA weighting schemes on weight restrictions, without requiring a prior information. The cross-efficiency evaluation may have some shortages, e.g. the cross-efficiency scores may not be unique due to the presence of several optima. To rectify this issue, several secondary goals have been proposed in the literature. Some scholars have proposed several cross-efficiency evaluations based on maximising (minimising) the total deviation from their ideal point as an aggressive (benevolent) perspective. In some cases, minimising (maximising) the number of DMUs that achieve their target efficiencies, is more important than maximising (minimising) the total deviation from the ideal point. We propose some alternative models for the cross-efficiency evaluation based on the cardinality of the set of "satisfied DMUs", i.e. the DMUs that achieve their maximum efficiencies. For aggressive (benevolent) cross-efficiency evaluation, among all the optimal weights for a specific unit, we choose the weights which can maximise its efficiency, and at the same time minimise (maximise) the number of satisfied units. We demonstrate how the proposed method can be implemented and illustrate the method using two examples.
引用
收藏
页码:807 / 816
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[11]   Using a DEA-cross efficiency approach in public procurement tenders [J].
Falagario, Marco ;
Sciancalepore, Fabio ;
Costantino, Nicola ;
Pietroforte, Roberto .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 218 (02) :523-529
[12]   Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation [J].
Green, RH ;
Doyle, JR ;
Cook, WD .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 90 (03) :461-472
[13]   Selecting symmetric weights as a secondary goal in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation [J].
Jahanshahloo, G. R. ;
Lotfi, F. Hosseinzadeh ;
Jafari, Y. ;
Maddahi, R. .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2011, 35 (01) :544-549
[14]   Alternative secondary goals in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation [J].
Liang, Liang ;
Wu, Jie ;
Cook, Wade D. ;
Zhu, Joe .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2008, 113 (02) :1025-1030
[15]   The DEA Game Cross-Efficiency Model and Its Nash Equilibrium [J].
Liang, Liang ;
Wu, Jie ;
Cook, Wade D. ;
Zhu, Joe .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2008, 56 (05) :1278-1288
[16]   Minimax and maximin formulations of cross-efficiency in DEA [J].
Lim, Sungmook .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 62 (03) :726-731
[17]   The DEA Game Cross-efficiency Model for Supplier Selection Problem under Competition [J].
Ma, Ruimin ;
Yao, Lifei ;
Jin, Maozhu ;
Ren, Peiyu .
APPLIED MATHEMATICS & INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2014, 8 (02) :811-818
[18]  
Maddahi Reza, 2014, International Journal of Operational Research, V19, P234, DOI 10.1504/IJOR.2014.058953
[19]   A METHODOLOGY FOR COLLECTIVE EVALUATION AND SELECTION OF INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS [J].
ORAL, M ;
KETTANI, O ;
LANG, P .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1991, 37 (07) :871-885
[20]   Reducing differences between profiles of weights: A "peer-restricted" cross-efficiency evaluation [J].
Ramon, Nuria ;
Ruiz, Jose L. ;
Sirvent, Inmaculada .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2011, 39 (06) :634-641