Tracking the Pharmaceutical Pipeline: Clinical Trials and Global Disease Burden

被引:7
作者
Cottingham, Marci D. [1 ]
Kalbaugh, Corey A. [2 ]
Fisher, Jill A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Social Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
来源
CTS-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE | 2014年 / 7卷 / 04期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
clinical trials; phase I; phase II; DRUG DEVELOPMENT;
D O I
10.1111/cts.12163
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Aggregate data about pharmaceutical research and development (R&D) tend to examine Phase III trials. Hence, there are few published data about investigational drugs in earlier phases of clinical development that might fail. It is also unclear how well R&D corresponds to disease burden. We track the pharmaceutical pipeline using data from industry publications that provide otherwise unreported information about industry-sponsored clinical trials. The sample includes 2,477 unique drug entities in 4,182 clinical trials. The majority of drugs targeted neoplasms (26.20%), neurological diseases/diseases of the sense organs (13.48%), infectious and parasitic diseases (10.5%), and endocrine, metabolic, nutrition, and immunity disorders (9.45%). Less than 6% of drugs targeted diseases of the circulatory system, which represent the most prevalent causes of global mortality. Detailing the pharmaceutical pipeline, our findings suggest that pharmaceutical development does not adequately address global disease burden. Future research on the under-reported details of Phase I and II clinical trials is needed to understand how the industry operates and how its resource-allocation matches global health concerns.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 299
页数:3
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Angell M., 2004, TRUTH DRUG CO THEY D, V1st ed.
[2]   The medicine cabinet: What's in it, why, and can we change the contents? [J].
Croghan, TW ;
Pittman, PM .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2004, 23 (01) :23-33
[3]   Trends in Risks Associated With New Drug Development: Success Rates for Investigational Drugs [J].
DiMasi, J. A. ;
Feldman, L. ;
Seckler, A. ;
Wilson, A. .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 87 (03) :272-277
[4]   Financing of US Biomedical Research and New Drug Approvals across Therapeutic Areas [J].
Dorsey, E. Ray ;
Thompson, Joel P. ;
Carrasco, Melisa ;
de Roulet, Jason ;
Vitticore, Philip ;
Nicholson, Sean ;
Johnston, S. Claiborne ;
Holloway, Robert G. ;
Moses, Hamilton, III .
PLOS ONE, 2009, 4 (09)
[5]   How Many "Me-Too" Drugs Is Too Many? [J].
Gagne, Joshua J. ;
Choudhry, Niteesh K. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 305 (07) :711-712
[6]   Clinical trial website struggles to serve as research data hub [J].
Heger, Monica .
NATURE MEDICINE, 2012, 18 (06) :837-837
[7]   Relation between burden of disease and randomised evidence in sub-Saharan Africa: survey of research [J].
Isaakidis, P ;
Swingler, GH ;
Pienaar, E ;
Volmink, J ;
Ioannidis, JPA .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7339) :702-705
[8]   Relation between the Global Burden of Disease and Randomized Clinical Trials Conducted in Latin America Published in the Five Leading Medical Journals [J].
Perel, Pablo ;
Miranda, J. Jaime ;
Ortiz, Zulma ;
Casas, Juan Pablo .
PLOS ONE, 2008, 3 (02)
[9]   Drug development for neglected diseases: a deficient market and a public-health policy failure [J].
Trouiller, P ;
Olliaro, P ;
Torreele, E ;
Orbinski, J ;
Laing, R ;
Ford, N .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9324) :2188-2194
[10]  
WHO, 2008, GLOB BURD DIS 2004 U