Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2014 Categorization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI: Comparison With Multiphasic Multidetector Computed Tomography

被引:58
|
作者
Joo, Ijin [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Jeong Min [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lee, Dong Ho [1 ,2 ]
Ahn, Su Joa [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Eun Sun [4 ]
Han, Joon Koo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Inst Radiat Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Chung Ang Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
KOREA PRACTICE GUIDELINES; NONINVASIVE DIAGNOSIS; HEPATOBILIARY-PHASE; LESS-THAN-OR-EQUAL-TO-2; CM; TRANSPLANT NETWORK; ORGAN PROCUREMENT; CRITERIA; CT; CLASSIFICATION; NODULES;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.25406
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2014 categorization of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-EOB-MRI) in comparison with multiphasic multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). Materials and Methods: Our Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective study and waived the requirement for informed consent. We included 182 high-risk patients with 216 pathologically confirmed HCCs who underwent both Gd-EOB-MRI at 1.5 or 3T and multiphasic MDCT. Two independent radiologists assessed the presence or absence of major HCC features and assigned LI-RADS categories before and after considering ancillary features on both MRI and MDCT. Finally, sensitivities of LR-5/5v and frequencies of major HCC features were compared between MRI and MDCT using the McNemar test. Results: Sensitivities of LR-5/5v were not significantly different between MRI and MDCT (63.4% [137/216] vs. 64.4% [139/216], P = 0.831; 60.6% [131/216] vs. 60.6% [131/216], P = 0.868, for reviewers 1 and 2, respectively). Among major HCC features seen on consensus review, washout and capsule appearance were less frequently observed on MRI than on MDCT (69.0% [149/216] vs. 87.0% [188/216], P < 0.001 and 17.1% [37/216] vs. 31.5% [68/216], P < 0.001), while no significant differences were found for arterial hyperenhancement (88.9% [192/216] vs. 84.7% [183/216], P = 0.081). Ancillary features led to category changes in 18.1% (39/216) of nodules on MRI (all, LR-3 to LR-4), while no changes were seen on MDCT. Conclusion: Using LI-RADS, Gd-EOB-MRI showed comparable sensitivity to multiphasic MDCT for the diagnosis of HCCs, and ancillary features of MRI frequently led to the upgrade of nodules from LR-3 to LR-4.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 740
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease: can hypointensity on the late portal venous phase be used as an alternative to washout?
    Baek, Kyoung A.
    Kim, Seung Soo
    Shin, Hyeong Cheol
    Hwang, Jeong Ah
    Choi, Seo-Youn
    Lee, Woong Hee
    Park, Chan Ho
    Lee, Hyoung Nam
    Heo, Nam Hun
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 45 (09) : 2705 - 2716
  • [42] Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Multi-Detector Row Computed Tomography
    Kim, Young Kon
    Kim, Chong Soo
    Han, Young Min
    Kwak, Hyo Sung
    Jin, Gong Yong
    Hwang, Seung Bae
    Chung, Gyung Ho
    Lee, Sang Yong
    Yu, Hee Chul
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2009, 33 (06) : 844 - 850
  • [43] Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasonography: comparison with CT/MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System in patients with suspected hepatocellular carcinoma
    Hwang, Jeong Ah
    Jeong, Woo Kyoung
    Min, Ji Hye
    Kim, Yeun-Yoon
    Heo, Nam Hun
    Lim, Hyo Keun
    ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2021, 40 (04) : 486 - 498
  • [44] Prospective Intraindividual Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Gadoxetic Acid and Extracellular Contrast for Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinomas Using the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System
    Min, Ji Hye
    Kim, Jong Man
    Kim, Young Kon
    Kang, Tae Wook
    Lee, Soon Jin
    Choi, Gyu Seong
    Choi, Seo-Youn
    Ahn, Soohyun
    HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 68 (06) : 2254 - 2267
  • [45] Atypical Appearance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Its Mimickers: How to Solve Challenging Cases Using Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Kim, Jae Hyun
    Joo, Ijin
    Lee, Jeong Min
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 20 (07) : 1019 - 1041
  • [46] Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2014 With Gadoxetate Disodium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Validation of LI-RADS Category 4 and 5 Criteria
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Byun, Jae Ho
    Kim, So Yeon
    Lee, So Jung
    Won, Hyung Jin
    Shin, Yong Moon
    Kim, Pyo Nyun
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2016, 51 (08) : 483 - 490
  • [47] Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinoma 1 cm or Smaller in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease: Characterization With Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI That Includes Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
    Kim, Ji-Eun
    Kim, Seong Hyun
    Lee, Soon Jin
    Rhim, Hyunchul
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 196 (06) : W758 - W765
  • [48] Comparison of gadoxetic acid versus gadopentetate dimeglumine for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma at 1.5 T using the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS v.2017)
    Ding, Ying
    Rao, Sheng-xiang
    Wang, Wen-tao
    Chen, Cai-zhong
    Li, Ren-chen
    Zeng, Mengsu
    CANCER IMAGING, 2018, 18
  • [49] Subcentimeter hypervascular nodules with typical imaging findings of hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: Outcomes of early treatment and watchful waiting
    Woo, Jung Han
    Song, Kyoung Doo
    Kim, Seong Hyun
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (10) : 4406 - 4414
  • [50] Value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in evaluation of hepatocellular carcinomas with atypical enhancement pattern on contrast-enhanced multiphasic MDCT in patients with chronic liver disease
    Kim, Hyun Su
    Kim, Seong Hyun
    Kang, Tae Wook
    Song, Kyoung Doo
    Choi, Dongil
    Park, Cheol Keun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (04) : 555 - 562