Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2014 Categorization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI: Comparison With Multiphasic Multidetector Computed Tomography

被引:58
|
作者
Joo, Ijin [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Jeong Min [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lee, Dong Ho [1 ,2 ]
Ahn, Su Joa [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Eun Sun [4 ]
Han, Joon Koo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Inst Radiat Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Chung Ang Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
KOREA PRACTICE GUIDELINES; NONINVASIVE DIAGNOSIS; HEPATOBILIARY-PHASE; LESS-THAN-OR-EQUAL-TO-2; CM; TRANSPLANT NETWORK; ORGAN PROCUREMENT; CRITERIA; CT; CLASSIFICATION; NODULES;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.25406
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2014 categorization of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-EOB-MRI) in comparison with multiphasic multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). Materials and Methods: Our Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective study and waived the requirement for informed consent. We included 182 high-risk patients with 216 pathologically confirmed HCCs who underwent both Gd-EOB-MRI at 1.5 or 3T and multiphasic MDCT. Two independent radiologists assessed the presence or absence of major HCC features and assigned LI-RADS categories before and after considering ancillary features on both MRI and MDCT. Finally, sensitivities of LR-5/5v and frequencies of major HCC features were compared between MRI and MDCT using the McNemar test. Results: Sensitivities of LR-5/5v were not significantly different between MRI and MDCT (63.4% [137/216] vs. 64.4% [139/216], P = 0.831; 60.6% [131/216] vs. 60.6% [131/216], P = 0.868, for reviewers 1 and 2, respectively). Among major HCC features seen on consensus review, washout and capsule appearance were less frequently observed on MRI than on MDCT (69.0% [149/216] vs. 87.0% [188/216], P < 0.001 and 17.1% [37/216] vs. 31.5% [68/216], P < 0.001), while no significant differences were found for arterial hyperenhancement (88.9% [192/216] vs. 84.7% [183/216], P = 0.081). Ancillary features led to category changes in 18.1% (39/216) of nodules on MRI (all, LR-3 to LR-4), while no changes were seen on MDCT. Conclusion: Using LI-RADS, Gd-EOB-MRI showed comparable sensitivity to multiphasic MDCT for the diagnosis of HCCs, and ancillary features of MRI frequently led to the upgrade of nodules from LR-3 to LR-4.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 740
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography and gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma: direct comparison and a meta-analysis
    Guo, Jin
    Seo, Youngkwon
    Ren, Shuo
    Hong, Sunwoo
    Lee, Dongki
    Kim, Soyoun
    Jiang, Yuanyuan
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 41 (10) : 1960 - 1972
  • [32] Comparison of the current guidelines for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma using gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Hwang, Shin Hye
    Park, Mi-Suk
    Park, Sumi
    Lim, Joon Seok
    Kim, Seung Up
    Park, Young Nyun
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (07) : 4492 - 4503
  • [33] Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2018: Impact on Categorization and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Staging
    Chernyak, Victoria
    Flusberg, Milana
    Berman, Jesse
    Fruitman, Kate C.
    Kobi, Mariya
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 25 (10) : 1488 - 1502
  • [34] Prediction of postoperative liver failure using gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
    Jin, Young-Joo
    Lee, Seung Ho
    Cho, Soon Gu
    Kim, Jun Ho
    Lee, Jin-Woo
    Lee, Kun Young
    Shin, Woo Young
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 31 (07) : 1349 - 1356
  • [35] Role of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma after locoregional treatment
    Gatti, Marco
    Maino, Cesare
    Darvizeh, Fatemeh
    Serafini, Alessandro
    Tricarico, Eleonora
    Guarneri, Alessia
    Inchingolo, Riccardo
    Ippolito, Davide
    Ricardi, Umberto
    Fonio, Paolo
    Faletti, Riccardo
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 28 (26) : 3116 - 3131
  • [36] Application of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2018 ancillary features to upgrade from LR-4 to LR-5 on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI
    Lee, Sunyoung
    Kim, Seung-seob
    Bae, Heejin
    Shin, Jaeseung
    Yoon, Ja Kyung
    Kim, Myeong-Jin
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (02) : 855 - 863
  • [37] Suboptimal performance of LI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant candidates
    Oh, Na Eun
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Kim, Sehee
    Lee, Habeen
    Jang, Hyeon Ji
    Byun, Jae Ho
    Won, Hyung Jin
    Shin, Yong Moon
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (01) : 465 - 474
  • [38] Association between non-hypervascular hypointense nodules on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and liver stiffness or hepatocellular carcinoma
    Hwang, Jeong Ah
    Kang, Tae Wook
    Kim, Young Kon
    Kim, Seong Hyun
    Paik, Yong Han
    Ha, Sang Yun
    Kim, Seonwoo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 95 : 362 - 369
  • [39] Comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR images in the evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma and hypovascular hepatocellular nodules
    Di Pietropaolo, Marco
    Briani, Chiara
    Federici, Giulia Francesca
    Marignani, Massimo
    Begini, Paola
    Delle Fave, Gianfranco
    Iannicelli, Elsa
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2015, 39 (03) : 468 - 475
  • [40] Direct Comparison of Four Presurgical Stratifying Schemes for Prediction of Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI
    Sun, Shu-Wen
    Liu, Qiu-Ping
    Xu, Xun
    Zhu, Fei-Peng
    Zhang, Yu-Dong
    Liu, Xi-Sheng
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2020, 52 (02) : 433 - 447