Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2014 Categorization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI: Comparison With Multiphasic Multidetector Computed Tomography

被引:58
|
作者
Joo, Ijin [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Jeong Min [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lee, Dong Ho [1 ,2 ]
Ahn, Su Joa [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Eun Sun [4 ]
Han, Joon Koo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Inst Radiat Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Chung Ang Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
KOREA PRACTICE GUIDELINES; NONINVASIVE DIAGNOSIS; HEPATOBILIARY-PHASE; LESS-THAN-OR-EQUAL-TO-2; CM; TRANSPLANT NETWORK; ORGAN PROCUREMENT; CRITERIA; CT; CLASSIFICATION; NODULES;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.25406
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2014 categorization of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-EOB-MRI) in comparison with multiphasic multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). Materials and Methods: Our Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective study and waived the requirement for informed consent. We included 182 high-risk patients with 216 pathologically confirmed HCCs who underwent both Gd-EOB-MRI at 1.5 or 3T and multiphasic MDCT. Two independent radiologists assessed the presence or absence of major HCC features and assigned LI-RADS categories before and after considering ancillary features on both MRI and MDCT. Finally, sensitivities of LR-5/5v and frequencies of major HCC features were compared between MRI and MDCT using the McNemar test. Results: Sensitivities of LR-5/5v were not significantly different between MRI and MDCT (63.4% [137/216] vs. 64.4% [139/216], P = 0.831; 60.6% [131/216] vs. 60.6% [131/216], P = 0.868, for reviewers 1 and 2, respectively). Among major HCC features seen on consensus review, washout and capsule appearance were less frequently observed on MRI than on MDCT (69.0% [149/216] vs. 87.0% [188/216], P < 0.001 and 17.1% [37/216] vs. 31.5% [68/216], P < 0.001), while no significant differences were found for arterial hyperenhancement (88.9% [192/216] vs. 84.7% [183/216], P = 0.081). Ancillary features led to category changes in 18.1% (39/216) of nodules on MRI (all, LR-3 to LR-4), while no changes were seen on MDCT. Conclusion: Using LI-RADS, Gd-EOB-MRI showed comparable sensitivity to multiphasic MDCT for the diagnosis of HCCs, and ancillary features of MRI frequently led to the upgrade of nodules from LR-3 to LR-4.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 740
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Diagnostic Performance of Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced Liver MR Imaging versus Multidetector CT in the Detection of Dysplastic Nodules and Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Kim, Bo Ram
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Lee, Dong Ho
    Yoon, Jeong Hee
    Hur, Bo Yun
    Suh, Kyung Suk
    Yi, Nam-Joon
    Lee, Kyung Boon
    Han, Joon Koo
    RADIOLOGY, 2017, 285 (01) : 134 - 146
  • [22] Intra-individual comparison of dual portal venous phases for non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma at gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI
    Kang, Hyo-Jin
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Jeon, Sun Kyung
    Jang, Siwon
    Park, Sungeun
    Joo, Ijin
    Yoon, Jeong Hee
    Han, Joon Koo
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (02) : 824 - 833
  • [23] Hepatic Angiomyolipoma Versus Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Noncirrhotic Liver on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI: A Diagnostic Challenge
    Lee, So Jung
    Kim, So Yeon
    Kim, Kyoung Won
    Kim, Jin Hee
    Kim, Hyoung Jung
    Lee, Moon-Gyu
    Yu, Eun Sil
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2016, 207 (03) : 562 - 570
  • [24] Comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced computed tomography with histopathological examinations for the identification of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter phase III study
    Masakatsu Tsurusaki
    Keitaro Sofue
    Hiroyoshi Isoda
    Masahiro Okada
    Kazuhiro Kitajima
    Takamichi Murakami
    Journal of Gastroenterology, 2016, 51 : 71 - 79
  • [25] Diagnostic algorithm for subcentimeter hepatocellular carcinoma using alpha-fetoprotein and imaging features on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI
    Huang, Peng
    Wu, Fei
    Hou, Kai
    Zhou, Changwu
    Xiao, Yuyao
    Wang, Cheng
    Miao, Gengyun
    Yang, Chun
    Zeng, Mengsu
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (04) : 2271 - 2282
  • [26] Comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced computed tomography with histopathological examinations for the identification of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter phase III study
    Tsurusaki, Masakatsu
    Sofue, Keitaro
    Isoda, Hiroyoshi
    Okada, Masahiro
    Kitajima, Kazuhiro
    Murakami, Takamichi
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 51 (01) : 71 - 79
  • [27] Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI with respect to the severity of liver cirrhosis
    Kim, Ah Yeong
    Kim, Young Kon
    Lee, Min Woo
    Park, Min Jung
    Hwang, Jiyoung
    Lee, Mi Hee
    Lee, Won Jae
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2012, 53 (08) : 830 - 838
  • [28] Differentiation of lipid poor angiomyolipoma from hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MR imaging
    Rihyeon Kim
    Jeong Min Lee
    Ijin Joo
    Dong Ho Lee
    Sungmin Woo
    Joon Koo Han
    Byung Ihn Choi
    Abdominal Imaging, 2015, 40 : 531 - 541
  • [29] Ring-Like Enhancement of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Multiphasic Hepatic Arterial Phase Imaging With Differential Subsampling With Cartesian Ordering
    Ichikawa, Shintaro
    Motosugi, Utaroh
    Oishi, Naoki
    Shimizu, Tatsuya
    Wakayama, Tetsuya
    Enomoto, Nobuyuki
    Matsuda, Masanori
    Onishi, Hiroshi
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2018, 53 (04) : 191 - 199
  • [30] Differentiation of intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MR imaging
    Kim, Rihyeon
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Shin, Cheong-Il
    Lee, Eun Sun
    Yoon, Jeong Hee
    Joo, Ijin
    Kim, Seong Ho
    Hwang, Inpyeong
    Han, Joon Koo
    Choi, Byung Ihn
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (06) : 1808 - 1817