Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2014 Categorization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI: Comparison With Multiphasic Multidetector Computed Tomography

被引:58
|
作者
Joo, Ijin [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Jeong Min [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lee, Dong Ho [1 ,2 ]
Ahn, Su Joa [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Eun Sun [4 ]
Han, Joon Koo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Inst Radiat Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Chung Ang Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
KOREA PRACTICE GUIDELINES; NONINVASIVE DIAGNOSIS; HEPATOBILIARY-PHASE; LESS-THAN-OR-EQUAL-TO-2; CM; TRANSPLANT NETWORK; ORGAN PROCUREMENT; CRITERIA; CT; CLASSIFICATION; NODULES;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.25406
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2014 categorization of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-EOB-MRI) in comparison with multiphasic multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). Materials and Methods: Our Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective study and waived the requirement for informed consent. We included 182 high-risk patients with 216 pathologically confirmed HCCs who underwent both Gd-EOB-MRI at 1.5 or 3T and multiphasic MDCT. Two independent radiologists assessed the presence or absence of major HCC features and assigned LI-RADS categories before and after considering ancillary features on both MRI and MDCT. Finally, sensitivities of LR-5/5v and frequencies of major HCC features were compared between MRI and MDCT using the McNemar test. Results: Sensitivities of LR-5/5v were not significantly different between MRI and MDCT (63.4% [137/216] vs. 64.4% [139/216], P = 0.831; 60.6% [131/216] vs. 60.6% [131/216], P = 0.868, for reviewers 1 and 2, respectively). Among major HCC features seen on consensus review, washout and capsule appearance were less frequently observed on MRI than on MDCT (69.0% [149/216] vs. 87.0% [188/216], P < 0.001 and 17.1% [37/216] vs. 31.5% [68/216], P < 0.001), while no significant differences were found for arterial hyperenhancement (88.9% [192/216] vs. 84.7% [183/216], P = 0.081). Ancillary features led to category changes in 18.1% (39/216) of nodules on MRI (all, LR-3 to LR-4), while no changes were seen on MDCT. Conclusion: Using LI-RADS, Gd-EOB-MRI showed comparable sensitivity to multiphasic MDCT for the diagnosis of HCCs, and ancillary features of MRI frequently led to the upgrade of nodules from LR-3 to LR-4.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 740
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] LI-RADS v2014 categorization of hepatocellular carcinoma: Intraindividual comparison between gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI
    Song, Ji Soo
    Choi, Eun Jung
    Hwang, Seung Bae
    Hwang, Hong Pil
    Choi, HyeMi
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (01) : 401 - 410
  • [2] Intra-individual comparison of hepatocellular carcinoma imaging computed tomconstrast-enhancedtte computed tomography, gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI, and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI
    Kim, Yo Na
    Song, Ji Soo
    Moon, Woo Sung
    Hwang, Hong Pil
    Kim, Young Kon
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2018, 59 (06) : 639 - 648
  • [3] Diagnostic accuracy of liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2014 for intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinomas in patients with chronic liver disease on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI
    Joo, Ijin
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Lee, Sang Min
    Lee, Jeong Sub
    Park, Jin Young
    Han, Joon Koo
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 44 (05) : 1330 - 1338
  • [4] Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System on CT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging
    Cha, Dong Ik
    Jang, Kyung Mi
    Kim, Seong Hyun
    Kang, Tae Wook
    Song, Kyoung Doo
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (10) : 4394 - 4405
  • [5] Gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging outperformed multidetector computed tomography in diagnosing small hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis
    Liu, Xijiao
    Jiang, Hanyu
    Chen, Jie
    Zhou, You
    Huang, Zixing
    Song, Bin
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 23 (12) : 1505 - 1518
  • [6] Liver imaging reporting and data system diagnostic performance in hepatocellular carcinoma when modifying the definition of "washout" on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Hu, Weijuan
    Lyu, Rong
    Wang, Di
    Gao, Zhongsong
    Sun, Cheng
    Jia, Kefeng
    ARAB JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 25 (01) : 58 - 63
  • [7] Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018: comparison between computed tomography and gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Sei Nakao
    Masahiro Tanabe
    Munemasa Okada
    Matakazu Furukawa
    Etsushi Iida
    Keisuke Miyoshi
    Naofumi Matsunaga
    Katsuyoshi Ito
    Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2019, 37 : 651 - 659
  • [8] Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018: comparison between computed tomography and gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Nakao, Sei
    Tanabe, Masahiro
    Okada, Munemasa
    Furukawa, Matakazu
    Iida, Etsushi
    Miyoshi, Keisuke
    Matsunaga, Naofumi
    Ito, Katsuyoshi
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 37 (09) : 651 - 659
  • [9] Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System on CT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging
    Dong Ik Cha
    Kyung Mi Jang
    Seong Hyun Kim
    Tae Wook Kang
    Kyoung Doo Song
    European Radiology, 2017, 27 : 4394 - 4405
  • [10] Performance of Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI for Detecting Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Recipients of Living-Related-Liver-Transplantation: Comparison With Dynamic Multidetector Row Computed Tomography and Angiography-Assisted Computed Tomography
    Kakihara, Daisuke
    Nishie, Akihiro
    Harada, Noboru
    Shirabe, Ken
    Tajima, Tsuyoshi
    Asayama, Yoshiki
    Ishigami, Kousei
    Nakayama, Tomohiro
    Takayama, Yukihisa
    Okamoto, Daisuke
    Fujita, Nobuhiro
    Kishimoto, Junji
    Honda, Hiroshi
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2014, 40 (05) : 1112 - 1120