Dual energy CT angiography: pros and cons of dual-energy metal artifact reduction algorithm in patients after endovascular aortic repair

被引:20
作者
Boos, Johannes [1 ]
Fang, Jieming [1 ]
Heidinger, Benedikt H. [1 ]
Raptopoulos, Vassilios [1 ]
Brook, Olga R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Radiol, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
Dual energy; Computed tomography; Metal artifact reduction; Endovascular aortic repair; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY; ANEURYSM REPAIR; ENDOLEAK DETECTION; DOSE REDUCTION; IMAGE QUALITY; SOFTWARE; EMBOLIZATION; SURVEILLANCE; PROSTHESES; HIP;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-016-0973-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the value of metal artifact reduction (MAR) post-processing and iodine MD images in fast kV-switching dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in patients after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). Materials and methods: Twenty-four consecutive EVAR patients (age 76 +/- 9 years, 7/24 (29%) with coils, 9/24 (37.5%) with 10 endoleaks) who underwent DECT angiography were included in this HIPAA-compliant, IRB-approved retrospective study. Monochromatic reconstructions included 55, 60, 65, 70, and 75 keV with and without MAR and iodine MD images. Near field, far field, and vessel artifacts were assessed subjectively (1 = none; 5 = severe) and objectively by measuring noise and contrast-to-noise ratio. Visibility of endoleak was evaluated (1 = optimal; 5 = not visible). Results: MARobjectively decreased artifacts from EVAR stents in the near field (60.7 +/- 25.4 HU vs. 70.1 +/- 34.2; p -.002) and subjectively increased near field (3.2 +/- 0.9 vs. 2.8 +/- 0.6; p <.001), far field (2.2 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.6 +/- 0.6; p < .001), and vessel (3.1 +/- 1.1 vs. 2.5 +/- 0.9; p <.001) artifacts. Near-field artifacts from coils were reduced by the MAR objectively (72.4 +/- 24.8 vs. 182.7 +/- 57.3 HU; p < .001) and subjectively (4.5 +/- 0.5 vs. 4.9 +/- 0.4; p < .02). CNR of standard reconstructions was optimal at 60 keV (38.3 +/- 16.8). Reconstructions without MAR and iodine MD images provided improved endoleak visualization in 6/10 (60%) of cases (median 1 for both) compared to MAR (median 3) (p < 0.001). However, MAR improved visualization in 1/10 (10%) cases due to endoleak location adjacent to a coil. Conclusion: DECT withMARreduced artifacts from coils and improved endoleak visualization in 1/10 (10%) cases due to location adjacent to a coil. However, MAR impaired endoleak visualization in 6/10 (60%) cases and should be reviewed combined with 60 keV standard reconstructions and iodine MD images.
引用
收藏
页码:749 / 758
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Metal artefact reduction in CT imaging of hip prostheses-an evaluation of commercial techniques provided by four vendors
    Andersson, K. M.
    Nowik, P.
    Persliden, J.
    Thunberg, P.
    Norrman, E.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 88 (1052)
  • [2] Dual-Energy CT for Detection of Endoleaks After Endovascular Abdominal Aneurysm Repair: Usefulness of Colored Iodine Overlay
    Ascenti, Giorgio
    Mazziotti, Silvio
    Lamberto, Salvatore
    Bottari, Antonio
    Caloggero, Simona
    Racchiusa, Sergio
    Mileto, Achille
    Scribano, Emanuele
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 196 (06) : 1408 - 1414
  • [3] Metal artifact reduction (MAR) based on two-compartment physical modeling: evaluation in patients with hip implants
    Boos, Johannes
    Sawicki, Lino Morris
    Lanzman, Rotem Shlomo
    Thomas, Christoph
    Aissa, Joel
    Schleich, Christoph
    Heusch, Philipp
    Antoch, Gerald
    Kroepil, Patric
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2017, 58 (01) : 70 - 76
  • [4] Spectral CT with Metal Artifacts Reduction Software for Improvement of Tumor Visibility in the Vicinity of Gold Fiducial Markers
    Brook, Olga R.
    Gourtsoyianni, Sofia
    Brook, Alexander
    Mahadevan, Anand
    Wilcox, Carol
    Raptopoulos, Vassilios
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2012, 263 (03) : 696 - 705
  • [5] Dual-source dual-energy CT: dose reduction after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
    Buffa, Vitaliano
    Solazzo, Antonio
    D'Auria, Valeria
    Del Prete, Alessandra
    Vallone, Andrea
    Luzietti, Monica
    Madau, Manuela
    Grassi, Roberto
    Miele, Vittorio
    [J]. RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2014, 119 (12): : 934 - 941
  • [6] Metal artifact reduction using virtual monochromatic images for patients with pedicle screws implants on CT
    Dong, Yue
    Shi, Ai Jun
    Wu, Jian Lin
    Wang, Ru Xin
    Sun, Li Fei
    Liu, Ai Lian
    Liu, Yi Jun
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 25 (06) : 1754 - 1763
  • [7] A Novel Pairwise Comparison-Based Method to Determine Radiation Dose Reduction Potentials of Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms, Exemplified Through Circle of Willis Computed Tomography Angiography
    Ellmann, Stephan
    Kammerer, Ferdinand
    Brand, Michael
    Allmendinger, Thomas
    May, Matthias S.
    Uder, Michael
    Lell, Michael M.
    Kramer, Manuel
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2016, 51 (05) : 331 - 339
  • [8] Automated Attenuation-Based Kilovoltage Selection: Preliminary Observations in Patients After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair of the Abdominal Aorta
    Goetti, Robert
    Winklehner, Anna
    Gordic, Sonja
    Baumueller, Stephan
    Karlo, Christoph A.
    Frauenfelder, Thomas
    Alkadhi, Hatem
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 199 (03) : W380 - W385
  • [9] Metal Artifact Reduction Software Used With Abdominopelvic Dual- Energy CT of Patients With Metal Hip Prostheses: Assessment of Image Quality and Clinical Feasibility
    Han, Seung Chol
    Chung, Yong Eun
    Lee, Young Han
    Park, Kwan Kyu
    Kim, Myeong Jin
    Kim, Ki Whang
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 203 (04) : 788 - 795
  • [10] An evaluation of three commercially available metal artifact reduction methods for CT imaging
    Huang, Jessie Y.
    Kerns, James R.
    Nute, Jessica L.
    Liu, Xinming
    Balter, Peter A.
    Stingo, Francesco C.
    Followill, David S.
    Mirkovic, Dragan
    Howell, Rebecca M.
    Kry, Stephen F.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (03) : 1047 - 1067