Techno-economic analysis of biofuel production via bio-oil zeolite upgrading: An evaluation of two catalyst regeneration systems

被引:45
|
作者
Shemfe, Mobolaji [1 ,2 ]
Gu, Sai [3 ]
Fidalgo, Beatriz [1 ]
机构
[1] Cranfield Univ, Bioenergy & Resource Management Ctr, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
[2] Univ Surrey, Ctr Environm & Sustainabil, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, England
[3] Univ Surrey, Dept Chem & Proc Engn, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, England
来源
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY | 2017年 / 98卷
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Zeolite cracking; Bio-oil; Aspen plus; Fast pyrolysis; Uncertainty analysis; Techno-economic analysis; BIOMASS FAST PYROLYSIS; TRANSPORTATION FUELS; IN-SITU; HYDROCARBONS; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.01.020
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Biofuels have been identified as a mid-term greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions abatement solution for decarbonising the transport sector. This study examines the techno-economic analysis of biofuel production via biomass fast pyrolysis and subsequent bio-oil upgrading via zeolite cracking. The aim of this study is to compare the techno-economic feasibility of two conceptual catalyst regeneration configurations for the zeolite cracking process: (i) a two-stage regenerator operating sequentially in partial and complete combustion modes (P-2RG) and (ii) a single stage regenerator operating in complete combustion mode coupled with a catalyst cooler (P-1RGC). The designs were implemented in Aspen Plus based on a hypothetical 72 t/day pine wood fast pyrolysis and zeolite cracking plant and compared in terms of energy efficiency and profitability. The energy efficiencies of P-2RG and P-IRGC were estimated at 54% and 52%, respectively with corresponding minimum fuel selling prices (MFSPs) of 7.48/GGE and 7.20/GGE. Sensitivity analysis revealed that the MFSPs of both designs are mainly sensitive to variations in fuel yield, operating cost and income tax. Furthermore, uncertainty analysis indicated that the likely range of the MFSPs of P-1RGC (5.81/GGE 11.63/GGE) at 95% probability was more economically favourable compared with P-2RG, along with a penalty of 2% reduction in energy efficiency. The results provide evidence to support the economic viability of biofuel production via zeolite cracking of pyrolysis derived bio-oil. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 193
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Techno-economic analysis of two bio-oil upgrading pathways
    Zhang, Yanan
    Brown, Tristan R.
    Hu, Guiping
    Brown, Robert C.
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2013, 225 : 895 - 904
  • [2] A comparative techno-economic assessment of three bio-oil upgrading routes for aviation biofuel production
    Michailos, Stavros
    Bridgwater, Anthony
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2019, 43 (13) : 7206 - 7228
  • [3] Techno-economic analysis of advanced biofuel production based on bio-oil gasification
    Li, Qi
    Zhang, Yanan
    Hu, Guiping
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 191 : 88 - 96
  • [4] Comparative techno-economic analysis of biohydrogen production via bio-oil gasification and bio-oil reforming
    Zhang, Yanan
    Brown, Tristan R.
    Hu, Guiping
    Brown, Robert C.
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2013, 51 : 99 - 108
  • [5] Techno-economic performance analysis of biofuel production and miniature electric power generation from biomass fast pyrolysis and bio-oil upgrading
    Shemfe, Mobolaji B.
    Gu, Sai
    Ranganathan, Panneerselvam
    FUEL, 2015, 143 : 361 - 372
  • [6] Techno-economic analysis of polygeneration systems based on catalytic hydropyrolysis for the production of bio-oil and fuels
    Tuong-Van Nguyen
    Clausen, Lasse Rongaard
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 184 : 539 - 558
  • [7] Process and Techno-Economic Analysis for Fuel and Chemical Production by Hydrodeoxygenation of Bio-Oil
    Bagnato, Giuseppe
    Sanna, Aimaro
    CATALYSTS, 2019, 9 (12)
  • [8] Investigating the techno-economic trade-offs of hydrogen source using a response surface model of drop-in biofuel production via bio-oil upgrading
    Wright, Mark M.
    Roman-Leshkov, Yuriy
    Green, William H.
    BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2012, 6 (05): : 503 - 520
  • [9] Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment of industrial production of ammonia via bio-oil conversion
    Zheng, Ji -Lu
    Zhu, Ya-Hong
    Dong, Yan-Yan
    Chen, Yue
    Zhu, Ming-Qiang
    ENERGY, 2023, 280
  • [10] Analysis of coke precursor on catalyst and study on regeneration of catalyst in upgrading of bio-oil
    Guo, Xiaoya
    Zheng, Yong
    Zhang, Baohua
    Chen, Jinyang
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2009, 33 (10): : 1469 - 1473