Evaluating public participation impact on environmental protection and ecological efficiency in China: Evidence from PITI disclosure

被引:178
作者
Tu, Zhengge [1 ]
Hu, Tianyang [1 ]
Shen, Renjun [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent China Normal Univ, Sch Econ & Business Adm, Res Ctr Low Carbon Econ & Environm Policies, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
Public participation; Difference-in-differences (DID) method; Environment technology efficiency; Environmental governance; ENERGY-CONSERVATION; AIR-POLLUTION; 5-YEAR PLAN; PERFORMANCE; DIFFERENCE; POLICY; TRADE; EIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.chieco.2019.03.010
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The industrial pollution caused by China's unprecedent economic expansion seriously imperils public health, giving rise to public's high demand for better environmental quality. The paper employs the difference-in-differences (DID) methodology to conduct a quasi-natural experiment based on the Pollution Information Transparency Index (PITI) to evaluate the public participation impact on pollution emissions reduction and environment technology efficiency. The results show that PITI information disclosure has a positive influence on pollution emissions reduction, however, some existing literatures may overstate the effect of public participation on environment improvement in China, the empirical results show that government administrative measures still play essential role at current stage. The paper also finds that the influence of public participation exists in eastern China rather than in central and western China. In addition, the results of using environment technology efficiency as outcome variable show insignificant effect, but eastern China has positive environment technology efficiency, suggesting that economic development may increase enterprise technological input, hence achieving mutually beneficial achievements of economy and ecological efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 123
页数:13
相关论文
共 54 条
[21]  
JAFFE AB, 1995, J ECON LIT, V33, P132
[22]   Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: A cointegration analysis for China [J].
Jalil, Abdul ;
Mahmud, Syed F. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (12) :5167-5172
[23]   BUSINESS CYCLE EFFECTS ON CONCERN ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE: THE CHILLING EFFECT OF RECESSION [J].
Kahn, Matthew E. ;
Kotchen, Matthew J. .
CLIMATE CHANGE ECONOMICS, 2011, 2 (03) :257-273
[24]   IMPACT OF INCREASING LOWER-STATUS CLIENTELE UPON CITY GOVERNMENTAL STRUCTURES - MODEL FROM ORGANIZATION THEORY [J].
KIRLIN, JJ .
URBAN AFFAIRS REVIEW, 1973, 8 (03) :317-343
[25]  
Li J., 2018, EC RES J, V09
[26]   Public participation in achieving sustainable development goals in China: Evidence from the practice of air pollution control [J].
Li, Ling ;
Xia, X. H. ;
Chen, Bin ;
Sun, Luxi .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 201 :499-506
[27]  
Lin B., 2003, MANAGEMENT WORLD, V11
[28]  
Lin K., 2011, Int. J. Soc. Qual, V1, P57, DOI [10.3167/ijsq.2011010106, DOI 10.3167/IJSQ.2011010106]
[29]   PROTEST AS A POLITICAL RESOURCES [J].
LIPSKY, M .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1968, 62 (04) :1144-1158
[30]   Energy conservation in China's Twelfth Five-Year Plan period: Continuation or paradigm shift? [J].
Lo, Kevin ;
Wang, Mark Y. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 18 :499-507