Effective doses from panoramic radiography and CBCT (cone beam CT) using dose area product (DAP) in dentistry

被引:58
作者
Shin, H. S. [1 ]
Nam, K. C. [2 ]
Park, H. [1 ,3 ]
Choi, H. U. [1 ]
Kim, H. Y. [1 ]
Park, C. S. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Dent Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Seoul 120749, South Korea
[2] Dongguk Univ, Dept Med Engn, Coll Med, Goyang, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Seoul 120749, South Korea
关键词
CBCT (cone beam CT); effective dose; ICRP; DAP (dose area product); conversion factor; DOSIMETRY; DEVICES;
D O I
10.1259/dmfr.20130439
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: We compared the effective dose from panoramic radiography with that from cone beam CT (CBCT) using dose area product under adult and child exposure conditions. Methods: The effective doses of the cephalo, panorama, implant and dental modes of Alphard 3030 (Asahi Roentgen Ind., Co. Ltd, Kyoto, Japan) CBCT and the Jaw, Wide, Facial and temporomandibular joint modes of Rayscan Symphony (RAY Co., Ltd, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea) CBCT were compared with those of CRANEX (R) 3+ CEPH (Soredex Orion Corporation, Helsinki, Finland) panoramic radiography equipment under adult and child exposure conditions. Each effective dose was calculated using a conversion formula from dose area product meter measured values (VacuTec Messtechnik GmbH, Dresden, Germany). The conversion formulae used were suggested by Helmrot and Alm Carlsson and Batista et al, and they were applied with the tube voltage taken into consideration. Results: The maximum effective doses from the Alphard 3030 and Rayscan Symphony were 67 and 21 times greater than that from panoramic radiography, respectively. The ratios of the effective dose under the child setting to that under the adult condition were 0.60-0.62 and 0.84-0.95, and the maximum differences in effective doses between the adult and child exposure settings were equivalent to 27 and 4 times greater than a panoramic examination in the Alphard 3030 and Rayscan Symphony, respectively. Conclusions: The effective CBCT doses were higher than those of panoramic radiography. The differences in effective doses between the adult and child CBCT settings were dependent on equipment type and exposure parameters. Therefore, adequate mode selection and control of exposure as well as further research are necessary to minimize the effective dose to patients, especially for radiosensitive children.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
American College of Radiology, 2013, ACR APPR CRIT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 6060127 IEC
[3]   Effective doses in panoramic images from conventional and CBCT equipment [J].
Batista, W. O. G. ;
Navarro, M. V. T. ;
Maia, A. F. .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2012, 151 (01) :67-75
[4]  
European Commission, 2012, Radiation protection No 172. Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology (Evidencebased guidelines)
[5]  
Health Protection Agency (HPA), 2013, HPACRCE010
[6]   Measurement of radiation dose in dental radiology [J].
Helmrot, E ;
Carlsson, GA .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 114 (1-3) :168-171
[7]  
Holroyd JR, RECOMMENDATIONS DESI
[8]  
International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), 2013, DIAGN REF LEV MED IM
[9]   A comparative study of the effective radiation doses from cone beam computed tomography and plain radiography for sialography [J].
Jadu, F. ;
Yaffe, M. J. ;
Lam, E. W. N. .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2010, 39 (05) :257-263
[10]   Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit [J].
Ludlow, JB ;
Davies-Ludlow, LE ;
Brooks, SL .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2003, 32 (04) :229-234