Resilience as a predictor for emotional response to the diagnosis and surgery in breast cancer patients

被引:77
作者
Markovitz, Sabine E. [1 ]
Schrooten, Ward [1 ,2 ]
Arntz, Arnoud [3 ,4 ]
Peters, Madelon L. [3 ]
机构
[1] ZOL Ziekenhuizen Oost Limburg, Genk, Belgium
[2] Univ Hasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium
[3] Maastricht Univ, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESILIENCE; POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS; PHYSICAL ADJUSTMENT; POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY; LIFE; SURVIVORSHIP; DISORDER; GROWTH; TRAUMA;
D O I
10.1002/pon.3834
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: The purposes of the present study were to investigate the role of resilience in the prediction of emotional response in breast cancer patients and to examine whether this association is specific for women undergoing this emotionally taxing condition or whether resilience is more generally associated with higher levels of emotional well-being. Methods: Two hundred fifty-three breast cancer patients and 211 healthy female controls completed four psychological questionnaires. Measures comprised the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, and two happiness items. Cancer patients were assessed after diagnosis and surgery. Results: Cancer patients reported higher levels of anxiety, depression, and negative affect and lower levels of positive affect and current happiness compared with control women. There was no difference between the two groups in level of resilience. Higher levels of resilience were related to better emotional adjustment both in women with breast cancer and in control women, but this association was stronger within the sample of cancer patients. In fact, patients scoring high on resilience seemed to experience similar levels of anxiety, depression, and current happiness as healthy women. Conclusion: Our results confirm that resilience may at least partially protect against emotional distress in cancer patients. Our findings suggest that resilience may be a relatively stable trait that is not affected by adversity. Copyright (C) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1639 / 1645
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Measuring happiness with a single-item scale [J].
Abdel-Khalek, AM .
SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2006, 34 (02) :139-149
[2]  
Aspinwall L.G., 2003, A psychology of human strengths: Fundamental questions and future directions for a positive psychology, DOI 10.1037/10566-008
[3]   Taking positive changes seriously - Toward a positive psychology of cancer survivorship and resilience [J].
Aspinwall, LG ;
MacNamara, A .
CANCER, 2005, 104 (11) :2549-2556
[4]   Loss, trauma, and human resilience - Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? [J].
Bonanno, GA .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2004, 59 (01) :20-28
[5]   What predicts psychological resilience after disaster? The role of demographics, resources, and life stress [J].
Bonanno, George A. ;
Galea, Sandro ;
Bucciarelli, Angela ;
Vlahov, David .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 75 (05) :671-682
[6]   Demographic and childhood environmental predictors of resilience in a community sample [J].
Campbell-Sills, Laura ;
Forde, David R. ;
Stein, Murray B. .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2009, 43 (12) :1007-1012
[7]   Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience scale (CD-RISC) [J].
Connor, KM ;
Davidson, JRT .
DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2003, 18 (02) :76-82
[8]   Psychosocial Adjustment Among Cancer Survivors: Findings From a National Survey of Health and Well-Being [J].
Costanzo, Erin S. ;
Ryff, Carol D. ;
Singer, Burton H. .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 28 (02) :147-156
[9]   Psychological adjustment in breast cancer: Processes of emotional distress [J].
Epping-Jordan, JE ;
Compas, BE ;
Osewiecki, DM ;
Oppedisano, G ;
Gerhardt, C ;
Primo, K ;
Krag, DN .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 18 (04) :315-326
[10]   Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems [J].
Garnefski, N ;
Kraaij, V ;
Spinhoven, P .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2001, 30 (08) :1311-1327