Preoperative Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis Prior to Office Balloon Sinus Dilation: A 2011-2014 MarketScan® Analysis

被引:2
作者
Jang, David W. [1 ]
Abraham, Cecily [2 ]
Cyr, Derek D. [2 ]
Schulz, Kristine [1 ]
Hachem, Ralph Abi [1 ]
Witsell, David L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Surg, Div Head & Neck Surg & Commun Sci, Durham, NC USA
[2] Duke Univ, Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
关键词
chronic rhinosinusitis; balloon dilation; balloon sinuplasty; health-care utilization; medical therapy of chronic rhinosinusitis; corticosteroid use; endoscopic sinus surgery; MarketScan; antibiotics; endoscopy; CATHETER DILATION; SURGERY; SINUPLASTY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1177/1945892419829335
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background In-office balloon sinus dilation (BSD) has recently gained popularity as a surgical treatment option for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). However, utilization, indications, and practice patterns surrounding in-office BSD remain unclear. Objective The purpose of this study was to use a large national administrative database to assess preoperative management of CRS prior to in-office BSD. Methods Patients undergoing standalone in-office BSD from 2011 to 2014 were identified on MarketScan and compared to a control group undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Visits to the otolaryngologist, number of computed tomography (CT) scans, number of antibiotic and steroid prescriptions, and duration of time from first visit to procedure were compared. Results When compared to the FESS group, the in-office BSD group overall had fewer office visits (2.0 vs 2.2), CT scans (1.0 vs 1.1), prescriptions for antibiotics (2.0 vs 2.2), prescriptions for systemic steroids (1.5 vs 1.8), and topical steroids (1.4 vs 1.5) in the preoperative period. They also had a shorter mean duration of time between first visit and CT scan (17.5 vs 21.4 days) as well as between first visit and procedure (55.0 vs 67.8 days). All of these findings were statistically significant. Conclusion In-office BSD for CRS was overall associated with less intense management in the preoperative period when compared to FESS. Such differences may reflect ongoing shifts in practice patterns and need to be further investigated.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 353
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [11] A validated case definition for chronic rhinosinusitis in administrative data: a Canadian perspective
    Rudmik, Luke
    Xu, Yuan
    Kukec, Edward
    Liu, Mingfu
    Dean, Stafford
    Quan, Hude
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2016, 6 (11) : 1167 - 1172
  • [12] Geographic variation of endoscopic sinus surgery in the united states
    Rudmik, Luke
    Holy, Chantal E.
    Smith, Timothy L.
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2015, 125 (08) : 1772 - 1778
  • [13] In-Office Balloon Catheter Dilation: Analysis of 628 Patients From an Administrative Claims Database
    Sillers, Michael J.
    Lay, Kristopher F.
    Holy, Chantal E.
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2015, 125 (01) : 42 - 48
  • [14] Determinants of outcomes of sinus surgery: A multi-institutional prospective cohort study
    Smith, Timothy L.
    Litvack, Jamie R.
    Hwang, Peter H.
    Loehr, Todd A.
    Mace, Jess C.
    Fong, Karen J.
    James, Kenneth E.
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2010, 142 (01) : 55 - 63
  • [15] Two-year results: transantral balloon dilation of the ethmoid infundibulum
    Stankiewicz, James
    Truitt, Theodore
    Atkins, James
    Winegar, Bradford
    Cink, Paul
    Raviv, Joseph
    Henderson, Diana
    Tami, Thomas
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2012, 2 (03) : 199 - 206
  • [16] Evolving trends in sinus surgery: What is the impact of balloon sinus dilation?
    Svider, Peter F.
    Darlin, Spencer
    Bobian, Michael
    Sekhsaria, Vibhav
    Harvey, Richard J.
    Gray, Stacey T.
    Baredes, Soly
    Folbe, Adam J.
    Eloy, Jean Anderson
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2018, 128 (06) : 1299 - 1303