Improving vocational rehabilitation services for injured workers in Washington State

被引:9
作者
Sears, Jeanne M. [1 ]
Wickizer, Thomas M. [2 ]
Schulman, Beryl A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Hlth Serv, Sch Publ Hlth, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Coll Publ Hlth, Div Hlth Serv Management & Policy, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
Vocational rehabilitation; Workers' compensation; Occupational injuries; Quality improvement; Return to work; Employment outcomes; Process evaluation; Impact evaluation; Policy impact; Stakeholders; RETURN; IMPLEMENTATION; COMPENSATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.12.006
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Workers who incur permanent impairments or have ongoing medical restrictions due to injuries or illnesses sustained at work may require support from vocational rehabilitation programs in order to return to work. Vocational rehabilitation programs implemented within workers' compensation settings are costly, and effective service delivery has proven challenging. The Vocational Improvement Project, a 5.5-year pilot program beginning in 2008, introduced major changes to the Washington State workers' compensation-based vocational rehabilitation program. In the evaluation of this pilot program, set within a large complex system characterized by competing stakeholder interests, we assessed effects on system efficiency and employment outcomes for injured workers. While descriptive in nature, this evaluation provided evidence that several of the intended outcomes were attained, including: (1) fewer repeat referrals, (2) fewer delays, (3) increased choice for workers, and (4) establishment of statewide partnerships to improve worker outcomes. There remains substantial room for further improvement. Retraining plan completion rates remain under 60% and only half of workers earned any wages within two years of completing their retraining plan. Ongoing communication with stakeholders was critical to the successful conduct and policy impact of this evaluation, which culminated in a 3-year extension of the pilot program through June 2016. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 35
页数:10
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Barth P., 2008, 08025 UPJ I STAT WAS
[2]   Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: Optimizing the role of stakeholders in implementation and research [J].
Franche, RL ;
Baril, R ;
Shaw, W ;
Nicholas, M ;
Loisel, P .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2005, 15 (04) :525-542
[3]  
Franklin Gary M, 2004, NeuroRx, V1, P356, DOI 10.1007/BF03206621
[4]  
Franklin GM, 1996, AM J IND MED, V29, P642
[5]  
KPMG LLP, 2009, WSIB LAB MARK REENTR
[6]   The 'Ability' Paradigm in Vocational Rehabilitation: Challenges in an Ontario Injured Worker Retraining Program [J].
MacEachen, E. ;
Kosny, A. ;
Ferrier, S. ;
Lippel, K. ;
Neilson, C. ;
Franche, R. L. ;
Pugliese, D. .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2012, 22 (01) :105-117
[7]  
MacEachen E., 2013, DISABILITY REHABILIT
[8]   The "Toxic Dose" of System Problems: Why Some Injured Workers Don't Return to Work as Expected [J].
MacEachen, Ellen ;
Kosny, Agnieszka ;
Ferrier, Sue ;
Chambers, Lori .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2010, 20 (03) :349-366
[9]  
Schulman B. A, 2013, J OCCUPATIONAL REHAB
[10]  
Sears J. M., 2012, 5920 ESSB