A discussion about thermal comfort evaluation in a bus terminal

被引:19
作者
Cardoso, Vitor E. M. [1 ]
Ramos, Nuno M. M. [1 ]
Almeida, Ricardo M. S. F. [1 ,2 ]
Barreira, Eva [1 ]
Martins, Joao Pocas [3 ]
Lurdes Simoes, M. [1 ]
Sanhudo, Luis [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Fac Engn FEUP, CONSTRUCT LFC, Rua Dr Roberto Frias S-N, P-4200465 Porto, Portugal
[2] Polytech Inst Viseu, Sch Technol & Management, Dept Civil Engn, Campus Politecn Repeses, P-3504510 Viseu, Portugal
[3] Univ Porto, Fac Engn FEUP, CONSTRUCT GEQUALTEC, Rua Dr Roberto Frias S-N, P-4200465 Porto, Portugal
关键词
Transport station; Thermal comfort; Steady-state models; Adaptive models; Questionnaire; Semi-outdoor environment; Transient spaces; AIR-CONDITIONED BUILDINGS; ADAPTIVE MODEL; INDOOR; FIELD; TEMPERATURE; PERCEPTION; ENVIRONMENT; ADAPTATION; STANDARDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.03.013
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Transport stations are distributive hubs composed of transient spaces, often not fully indoor, where most users spend time waiting to travel or waiting for travelers. The aim of this article is to present a comparison between thermal comfort evaluation methods applied in a free running bus terminal located in a mild climate country. Data was collected in field measurements and surveys were performed on 240 passengers, focusing warm season operation conditions. The collected information allowed for the analysis of the comfort conditions of the station according to the following comfort models: PMV-PPD, aPMV, and the adaptive models defined in the ASHRAE 55 and EN 15251 standards. A comparison between the results and the thermal preference (MTP) and the thermal sensation (MTS) expressed in the ISO 10551 subjective scales was performed. It could be concluded that the PMV-PPD and aPMV models overestimated the cooling sensation. The ASHRAE 55 and EN 15251 adaptive approach, although more permissive, still was not totally in line with the thermal sensation of the respondents. An alternative approach based on the correlation between SET* and dissatisfied voters established through the thermal preference method provided a wider comfort range that appears, in this case, to be adequate. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 96
页数:11
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Thermal comfort models and pupils' perception in free-running school buildings of a mild climate country [J].
Almeida, Ricardo M. S. F. ;
Ramos, Nuno M. M. ;
de Freitas, Vasco P. .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2016, 111 :64-75
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, ISO 7726
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, ISO10551
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ASHRAE Stand
[5]   Thermal comfort for free-running buildings [J].
Baker, N ;
Standeven, M .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 1996, 23 (03) :175-182
[6]  
Bank A. D., 2015, IMPROVING ENERGY EFF
[7]   Comparison of UTCI to selected thermal indices [J].
Blazejczyk, Krzysztof ;
Epstein, Yoram ;
Jendritzky, Gerd ;
Staiger, Henning ;
Tinz, Birger .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMETEOROLOGY, 2012, 56 (03) :515-535
[8]   PHYSIOLOGICAL ROLE OF PLEASURE [J].
CABANAC, M .
SCIENCE, 1971, 173 (4002) :1103-+
[9]  
*CEN EN, 2007, 15251 CEN
[10]   Thermal comfort in urban transitional spaces [J].
Chun, C ;
Tamura, A .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 40 (05) :633-639