Simultaneous Constrained Adaptive Item Selection for Group-Based Testing

被引:2
作者
Bengs, Daniel [1 ]
Kroehne, Ulf [1 ]
Brefeld, Ulf [2 ]
机构
[1] DIPF Leibniz Inst Res & Informat Educ, Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Leuphana Univ, Luneburg, Germany
关键词
EXPOSURE CONTROL METHODS; QUALITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/jedm.12285
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
By tailoring test forms to the test-taker's proficiency, Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) enables substantial increases in testing efficiency over fixed forms testing. When used for formative assessment, the alignment of task difficulty with proficiency increases the chance that teachers can derive useful feedback from assessment data. The application of CAT to formative assessment in the classroom, however, is hindered by the large number of different items used for the whole class; the required familiarization with a large number of test items puts a significant burden on teachers. An improved CAT procedure for group-based testing is presented, which uses simultaneous automated test assembly to impose a limit on the number of items used per group. The proposed linear model for simultaneous adaptive item selection allows for full adaptivity and the accommodation of constraints on test content. The effectiveness of the group-based CAT is demonstrated with real-world items in a simulated adaptive test of 3,000 groups of test-takers, under different assumptions on group composition. Results show that the group-based CAT maintained the efficiency of CAT, while a reduction in the number of used items by one half to two-thirds was achieved, depending on the within-group variance of proficiencies.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 261
页数:26
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Formative assessment: a critical review [J].
Bennett, Randy .
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2011, 18 (01) :5-25
[2]   The Changing Nature of Educational Assessment [J].
Bennett, Randy Elliot .
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATION, VOL 39: TEACHER ASSESSMENT AND THE ASSESSMENT OF STUDENTS WITH DIVERSE LEARNING NEEDS, 2015, 39 :370-407
[3]  
Black P., 1998, ASSESS EDUC, V5, P7, DOI [DOI 10.1080/0969595980050102, https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102]
[4]  
Boekkooi-Timminga E., 1989, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V54, P237
[5]   A comparative study of item exposure control methods in computerized adaptive testing [J].
Chang, SW ;
Ansley, TN .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 2003, 40 (01) :71-103
[6]   The relationship between item exposure and test overlap in computerized adaptive testing [J].
Chen, SY ;
Ankenmann, RD ;
Spray, JA .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 2003, 40 (02) :129-145
[7]  
Ditton H, 2008, Z PADAGOGIK, P36
[8]  
Fox Jean-Paul, 2007, JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, V20
[9]  
Frey A., 2011, COMPUTERISIERTES ADA
[10]  
Hattie J, 2011, EDUC PSYCHOL HANDB, P249