Prevalence of Smoke-Free Car and Home Rules in Maine Before and After Passage of a Smoke-Free Vehicle Law, 2007-2010

被引:23
作者
Murphy-Hoefer, Rebecca [1 ]
Madden, Patrick [2 ]
Maines, Dorean [3 ]
Coles, Carol [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ New England, Sch Community & Populat Hlth, Portland, ME 04103 USA
[2] Market Decis, Portland, ME USA
[3] Tobacco Free Maine, Augusta, ME USA
关键词
TOBACCO-SMOKE; SECONDHAND SMOKE; CHILDREN; POLLUTION; EXPOSURE; INCREASES; RISK; AIR;
D O I
10.5888/pcd11.130132
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction This is the first study to examine the prevalence of self-reported smoke-free rules for private cars and homes before and after the passage of a smoke-free vehicle law. Methods Data were examined for 13,461 Maine adults aged 18 or older who participated in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, a state-based telephone survey covering health topics. Self-reported smoke-free car and home rules, smoking behavior, and demographic variables of age, sex, education, income, and children in household were analyzed for prevalence before and after the state's smoke-free vehicle law was passed. Results Prevalence of smoke-free car and home rules was significantly higher after Maine's smoke-free vehicle law was passed in the state (P=.004 for car rules and P=.009 for home rules). Variations in smoking rules differed by smoking and demographic variables. People with household incomes of less than $20,000 saw an increase of 14.3% in smoke-free car rules; overall, those with annual incomes of less than $20,000 and those with less than a high school education reported a lower prevalence of smoke-free car rules both before and after the law was passed than did people with higher incomes and higher education levels. The prevalence of smoke-free home rules after the law was implemented was higher among those with 4 or more years of college education than among those with lower levels of education (P=.02). Conclusion The prevalence of smoke-free car and home rules among Maine adults was significantly higher after the passage of a statewide smoke-free vehicle law. This apparent change in smoke-free rule prevalence may be indicative of changing social norms related to the unacceptability of secondhand smoke exposure.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Smoking restrictions in the home and secondhand smoke exposure among primary schoolchildren before and after introduction of the Scottish smoke-free legislation [J].
Akhtar, P. C. ;
Haw, S. J. ;
Currie, D. B. ;
Zachary, R. ;
Currie, C. E. .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 2009, 18 (05) :409-U103
[2]  
Anonymous, 2007, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V56, P501
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, TOB CONTR STAT HIGHL
[5]  
[Anonymous], SMOK CARS
[6]   Secondhand Tobacco Smoke: A Source of Lead Exposure in US Children and Adolescents [J].
Apostolou, Andria ;
Garcia-Esquinas, Esther ;
Fadrowski, Jeffrey J. ;
McLain, Pat ;
Weaver, Virginia M. ;
Navas-Acien, Ana .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 102 (04) :714-722
[7]   Determinants and consequences of smoke-free homes: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey [J].
Borland, R. ;
Yong, H-H ;
Cummings, K. M. ;
Hyland, A. ;
Anderson, S. ;
Fong, G. T. .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 2006, 15 :42-50
[8]  
Etzel RA, 1997, PEDIATRICS, V99, P639
[9]   Reductions in tobacco smoke pollution and increases in support for smoke-free public places following the implementation of comprehensive smoke-free workplace legislation in the Republic of Ireland: findings from the ITC Ireland/UK Survey [J].
Fong, G. T. ;
Hyland, A. ;
Borland, R. ;
Hammond, D. ;
Hastings, G. ;
McNeill, A. ;
Anderson, S. ;
Cummings, K. M. ;
Allwright, S. ;
Mulcahy, M. ;
Howell, F. ;
Clancy, L. ;
Thompson, M. E. ;
Connolly, G. ;
Driezen, P. .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 2006, 15 :51-58
[10]   Smoke-Free-Home Rules Among Women With Infants, 2004-2008 [J].
Gibbs, Falicia A. ;
Tong, Van T. ;
Farr, Sherry L. ;
Dietz, Patricia M. ;
Babb, Stephen .
PREVENTING CHRONIC DISEASE, 2012, 9 :E164