Modelling past, present and future Ecosystem Services supply in a protected floodplain under land use and climate changes

被引:39
作者
Gaglio, M. [1 ]
Aschonitis, V [2 ]
Pieretti, L. [1 ]
Santos, L. [3 ,4 ]
Gissi, E. [5 ]
Castaldelli, G. [1 ]
Fano, E. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ferrara, Dept Life Sci & Biotechnol, Via L Borsari 46, I-44121 Ferrara, Italy
[2] Hellen Agr Org, DEMETER, Soil & Water Resources Inst, Thessaloniki 57001, Greece
[3] Inst Politecn Tomar, Geosci Ctr, Estr Da Serra,Quinta Contador, P-2300313 Tomar, Portugal
[4] Consultant Comm Boquilobo Biosphere Reserve, Golega, Portugal
[5] IUAV Univ Venice, S Croce 1957, I-30135 Venice, Italy
关键词
Protected areas; Ecosystem services trade-offs; InVEST model; Carbon storage; Water flow regulation; CARBON STORAGE; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; SPATIAL-ANALYSIS; TRADE-OFF; RIVER; AREAS; SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT; SCENARIOS; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.04.019
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The understanding of protection initiatives' effects on the delivery of Ecosystem Services (ESs) is of paramount importance to attain sustainable management in Protected Areas (PAs). Protected floodplains provide important ESs to local populations such as water flow regulation and climate regulation through carbon storage. This study investigates the effects of biodiversity protection initiatives (i.e. declaration of Protected Areas - PAs) and the related spatio-temporal land use/land cover (LULC) changes on ecosystem services (ESs) in the Nature Reserve of Paul do Boquilobo - NRPB (Central Portugal). Special focus was made on climate mitigation (i.e. carbon storage and sequestration) and water-related (flood mitigation, water regulation and supply) ESs. The analysis was performed using InVEST model. Three dates of past LULC conditions were considered in the analysis (1967, 1990 and 2015). Moreover, two future alternative LULC scenarios for 2050 were designed (a "Business"- BUS and a "Naturalization"- NAT scenario). The BUS scenario considers a LULC distribution towards high productive agricultural systems, considering only a restricted central core of natural areas, while the NAT scenario considers full coverage of natural areas. The two future extreme LULC scenarios were analyzed considering both no climate change and climate change effects on water-related services based on the pessimistic rcp8.5 climatic scenario. The results showed that PA declaration of NRPB after 1980 increased carbon storage-sequestration and flood mitigation (higher water storage, lower recharge and runoff). The analysis of future LULC scenarios demonstrated that the complete renaturing in combination with climate change (reduction of precipitation, increase of temperature) may lead to severe reduction of recharge and runoff. These results indicate that conflicts may appear between specific water regulation services by the application of PA initiatives in places where ground-water resources are limited or minimum ecological flows in surface waters are difficult to be preserved.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 34
页数:12
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]   Protected areas reduced poverty in Costa Rica and Thailand [J].
Andam, Kwaw S. ;
Ferraro, Paul J. ;
Sims, Katharine R. E. ;
Healy, Andrew ;
Holland, Margaret B. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (22) :9996-10001
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
[3]   How does climate change affect biodiversity? [J].
Araujo, Miguel B. ;
Rahbek, Carsten .
SCIENCE, 2006, 313 (5792) :1396-1397
[4]   Modeling plant density and ponding water effects on flooded rice evapotranspiration and crop coefficients: critical discussion about the concepts used in current methods [J].
Aschonitis, Vassilis ;
Diamantopoulou, Maria ;
Papamichail, Dimitris .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2018, 132 (3-4) :1165-1186
[5]   High-resolution global grids of revised Priestley-Taylor and Hargreaves-Samani coefficients for assessing ASCE-standardized reference crop evapotranspiration and solar radiation` [J].
Aschonitis, Vassilis G. ;
Papamichail, Dimitris ;
Demertzi, Kleoniki ;
Colombani, Nicolo ;
Mastrocicco, Micol ;
Ghirardini, Andrea ;
Castaldelli, Giuseppe ;
Fano, Elisa-Anna .
EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE DATA, 2017, 9 (02) :615-638
[6]   A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation [J].
Bagstad, Kenneth J. ;
Semmens, Darius J. ;
Waage, Sissel ;
Winthrop, Robert .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2013, 5 :E27-E39
[7]   Ecosystem services in Mediterranean river basin: Climate change impact on water provisioning and erosion control [J].
Bangash, Rubab F. ;
Passuello, Ana ;
Sanchez-Canales, Maria ;
Terrado, Marta ;
Lopez, Alfredo ;
Javier Elorza, F. ;
Ziv, Guy ;
Acuna, Vicenc ;
Schuhmacher, Marta .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 458 :246-255
[8]   Water quality monitoring in the Paul do Boquilobo Biosphere Reserve [J].
Baptista, C. ;
Santos, L. .
PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2016, 94 :180-187
[9]   Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity [J].
Bellard, Celine ;
Bertelsmeier, Cleo ;
Leadley, Paul ;
Thuiller, Wilfried ;
Courchamp, Franck .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2012, 15 (04) :365-377
[10]   Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services [J].
Bennett, Elena M. ;
Peterson, Garry D. ;
Gordon, Line J. .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2009, 12 (12) :1394-1404