Intrapartum nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing and prediction of adverse outcomes: interobserver variability

被引:104
作者
Chauhan, Suneet P. [1 ]
Klauser, Chad K. [2 ]
Woodring, Thomas C. [3 ]
Sanderson, Maureen [4 ]
Magann, Everett F. [1 ]
Morrison, John C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Aurora Hlth Care, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Dept Maternal Fetal Med, W Allis, WI USA
[2] NYU, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, New York, NY 10016 USA
[3] Univ Mississippi, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Jackson, MI USA
[4] Meharry Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Nashville, TN 37208 USA
关键词
cesarean delivery; interobserver variability; nonreassuring fetal heart tracing; umbilical arterial pH < 7.00;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.027
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: We determined interobserver variability in the classification of fetal heart rate ( FHR) tracing with periodic deceleration as being reassuring or nonreassuring and in the ability to predict emergency cesarean delivery ( ECD) or umbilical arterial pH < 7.00. STUDY DESIGN: Five clinicians reviewed 100 FHR tracings 1 hour before abnormalities and, if applicable, the hour before delivery. We calculated weighted Kappa coefficients ( WKC) to assess interobserver variability and likelihood ratio of FHR tracing to identify ECD and low pH. RESULTS: Among 100 parturients, 46% of the women had ECD, and 2% of the women had low pH. The WKC for the classification of the FHR tracing as reassuring or nonreassuring in early labor was -0.12 and before delivery was 0.15. The WKC for ECD was 0.26 and for low pH was 0.21. The likelihood ratio for these 2 outcomes was < 2.0. CONCLUSION: There was poor agreement among the clinicians who classified FHR as reassuring vs nonreassuring; they could not identify which parturient would have ECD or a newborn infant with low pH.
引用
收藏
页码:623.e1 / 623.e5
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour [J].
Alfirevic, Z. ;
Devane, D. ;
Gyte, G. M. L. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (03)
[2]  
*AM COLL OBST GYN, 2003, NEON ENC CER PALS DE
[3]  
*AM COLL OBST GYN, 2005, ACOG PRACT B, V70
[4]  
BEAULIEU MD, 1982, CAN MED ASSOC J, V127, P214
[5]   Neonatal organ dysfunction among newborns at gestational age ≥34 weeks and umbilical arterial pH &lt;7.00 [J].
Chauhan, SP ;
Hendrix, NW ;
Magann, EF ;
Sanderson, M ;
Bofill, JA ;
Briery, CM ;
Morrison, JC .
JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2005, 17 (04) :261-268
[6]   Midwives' visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs: intra- and inter-observer agreement [J].
Devane, D ;
Lalor, J .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2005, 52 (02) :133-141
[7]   A comparison of visual analyses of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings according to the new National Institute of Child Health and Human Development guidelines with computer analyses by an automated fetal heart rate monitoring system [J].
Devoe, L ;
Golde, S ;
Kilman, Y ;
Morton, D ;
Shea, K ;
Waller, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 183 (02) :361-365
[8]  
GOLDABER KG, 1991, OBSTET GYNECOL, V78, P1103
[9]  
HANKINS GV, 1999, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V181, P867
[10]   FACTORS INVOLVED IN THE INTERPRETATION OF FETAL MONITOR TRACINGS [J].
HELFAND, M ;
MARTON, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1985, 151 (06) :737-744