Dose-response and efficacy of spinal manipulation for care of chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial

被引:79
作者
Haas, Mitchell [1 ]
Vavrek, Darcy [1 ]
Peterson, David [2 ]
Polissar, Nayak [3 ]
Neradilek, Moni B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western States, Ctr Outcomes Studies, Portland, OR 97230 USA
[2] Univ Western States, Div Chiropract Sci, Portland, OR 97230 USA
[3] Mt Whisper Light Stat, Seattle, WA 98122 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Chronic low back pain; Dose-response; Spinal manipulation; Chiropractic; Randomized controlled trial; PHYSICAL-THERAPY; CLINICAL-TRIALS; OUTCOMES; DISABILITY; VALIDITY; TESTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.468
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: There have been no full-scale trials of the optimal number of visits for the care of any condition with spinal manipulation. PURPOSE: To identify the dose-response relationship between visits to a chiropractor for spinal manipulation and chronic low back pain (cLBP) outcomes and to determine the efficacy of manipulation by comparison with a light massage control. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Practice-based randomized controlled trial. PATIENT SAMPLE: Four hundred participants with cLBP. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary cLBP outcomes were the 100-point modified Von Korff pain intensity and functional disability scales evaluated at the 12- and 24-week primary end points. Secondary outcomes included days with pain and functional disability, pain unpleasantness, global perceived improvement, medication use, and general health status. METHODS: One hundred participants with cLBP were randomized to each of four dose levels of care: 0, 6, 12, or 18 sessions of spinal manipulation from a chiropractor. Participants were treated three times per week for 6 weeks. At sessions when manipulation was not assigned, they received a focused light massage control. Covariate-adjusted linear dose effects and comparisons with the no-manipulation control group were evaluated at 6, 12, 18, 24, 39, and 52 weeks. RESULTS: For the primary outcomes, mean pain and disability improvement in the manipulation groups were 20 points by 12 weeks and sustainable to 52 weeks. Linear dose-response effects were small, reaching about two points per six manipulation sessions at 12 and 52 weeks for both variables (p < .025). At 12 weeks, the greatest differences from the no-manipulation control were found for 12 sessions (8.6 pain and 7.6 disability points, p < .025); at 24 weeks, differences were negligible; and at 52 weeks, the greatest group differences were seen for 18 visits (5.9 pain and 8.8 disability points, p < .025). CONCLUSIONS: The number of spinal manipulation visits had modest effects on cLBP outcomes above those of 18 hands-on visits to a chiropractor. Overall, 12 visits yielded the most favorable results but was not well distinguished from other dose levels. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1106 / 1116
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Randomization, balance, and the validity and efficiency of design-adaptive allocation methods [J].
Aickin, M .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2001, 94 (01) :97-119
[2]   PROBLEMS OF CLASSIFICATION OF LOW-BACK-PAIN [J].
ANDERSON, JAD .
RHEUMATOLOGY AND REHABILITATION, 1977, 16 (01) :34-36
[3]   Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain [J].
Andersson, GBJ .
LANCET, 1999, 354 (9178) :581-585
[4]   TREATMENT ALLOCATION PROCEDURE FOR SEQUENTIAL CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
BEGG, CB ;
IGLEWICZ, B .
BIOMETRICS, 1980, 36 (01) :81-90
[5]  
Belanger A, 2002, EVIDENCE BASED GUIDE, P223
[6]   Evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with spinal manipulation and mobilization [J].
Bronfort, Gert ;
Haas, Mitch ;
Evans, Roni ;
Kawchuk, Greg ;
Dagenais, Simon .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (01) :213-225
[7]  
Cherkin Daniel C, 2002, J Am Board Fam Pract, V15, P463
[8]   Nonpharmacologic therapies for acute and chronic low back pain: A review of the evidence for an American pain Society/American college of physicians clinical practice guideline [J].
Chou, Roger ;
Huffman, Laurie Hoyt .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 147 (07) :492-504
[9]   Physical therapy outcomes for patients receiving workers' compensation following treatment for herniated lumbar disc and mechanical low back pain syndrome [J].
DiFabio, RP ;
Mackey, G ;
Holte, JB .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1996, 23 (03) :180-187
[10]   Interpreting the clinical importance of group differences in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations [J].
Dworkin, Robert H. ;
Turk, Dennis C. ;
McDermott, Michael P. ;
Peirce-Sandner, Sarah ;
Burke, Laurie B. ;
Cowan, Penney ;
Farrar, John T. ;
Hertz, Sharon ;
Raja, Srinivasa N. ;
Rappaport, Bob A. ;
Rauschkolb, Christine ;
Sampaio, Cristina .
PAIN, 2009, 146 (03) :238-244