Comparison of self-determination of students with disabilities: multivariate and discriminant function analyses

被引:7
|
作者
Chou, Y. -C. [1 ]
Palmer, S. B. [2 ]
Wehmeyer, M. L. [2 ]
Skorupski, W. P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Chung Yuan Christian Univ, Dept Special Educ, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[2] Univ Kansas, Dept Special Educ, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[3] Univ Kansas, Dept Educ Psychol, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
关键词
autonomous functioning; locus of control; problem solving; self-determination; GENERAL-EDUCATION CURRICULUM; PROBLEM-SOLVING SKILLS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; MENTAL-RETARDATION; COGNITIVE DISABILITIES; LEARNING-MODEL; SOCIAL-SKILLS; CONTROL SCALE; INTERVENTION; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1111/jir.12297
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
BackgroundSelf-determined behaviour is composed of multiple, interrelated component elements, and yet little empirical study has researched the self-determination components other than choice making and goal setting. Also, few theoretical relationships have been drawn between the component elements of self-determined behaviour and the impact of disability category. Therefore, this study examined profiles of the combination of three self-report measures of component elements of self-determined behaviour (autonomous functioning, problem solving and internal locus of control) between two groups (ID and learning disabilities/emotional disorders). MethodWe analysed data from 96 middle school and high school students ages 13 through 22years who completed three self-report instruments of the Autonomy - section 1 of The Arc's Self-determination Scale, the Problem Solving Survey and the Nowicki-Strickland Locus of Control Scale. A multivariate analysis of covariance was conducted to investigate the differences between the two groups after controlling for the developmental effects of age. A discriminant function analysis examined whether membership of the two groups could be predicted from the three component elements. ResultsResults showed that each group had different profiles within the combined three component elements of self-determination but groups were not different on any single measure of component elements of self-determined behaviour exclusively. The combination of three variables was useful in confirming the membership of two dichotomous groups. ConclusionsScore differences on the three component behaviour imply that the two groups have different instructional needs and therefore require differentiated instructional approaches. The three measures of the component elements of self-determined behaviour collectively separate the two groups, suggesting that the component elements should be considered in a combination as opposed to being treated as individual elements in the context of discussing self-determined behaviour.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 154
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Predictors of Self-Determination in Postsecondary Education for Students with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
    Shogren, Karrie A.
    Wehmeyer, Michael L.
    Shaw, Leslie A.
    Grigal, Meg
    Hart, Debra
    Smith, Frank A.
    Khamsi, Sheida
    EDUCATION AND TRAINING IN AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2018, 53 (02) : 146 - 159
  • [22] Success and self-determination: a systematic review of the narratives of students and graduates with disabilities
    Morina, Anabel
    Martins, Maria Helena
    HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2024, : 1107 - 1123
  • [23] Application of Self-Determination by Students with Disabilities in Acquiring STEM Internship Accommodations
    Duerstock, Bradley S.
    Taylor, Carlos
    Field, Sharon
    JOURNAL OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION AND DISABILITY, 2024, 37 (03):
  • [24] Perceptions and Experiences of Self-determination of Students and Youth with Intellectual Disabilities in Korea
    Lee, Suk-Hyang
    Hong, Juhee
    Yeom, Ji-Hye
    Lee, JungAh
    ADVANCES IN NEURODEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2019, 3 (02) : 138 - 151
  • [25] The relationship between self-determination and academic achievement for adolescents with intellectual disabilities
    Erickson, Amy S. Gaumer
    Noonan, Patricia M.
    Zheng, Chunmei
    Brussow, Jennifer A.
    RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2015, 36 : 45 - 54
  • [26] Partnership with social care professionals as a context for promoting self-determination among people with intellectual disabilities
    Cudre-Mauroux, Annick
    Pierart, Genevieve
    Vaucher, Carla
    RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2020, 99
  • [27] Levels of self-determination in the ageing population with intellectual disabilities
    Alvarez-Aguado, Izaskun
    Vega Cordova, Vanessa
    Spencer Gonzalez, Herbert
    Gonzalez Carrasco, Felix
    Jarpa Azagra, Marcela
    Exss Cid, Katherine
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 2022, 50 (04) : 494 - 503
  • [28] The Impact of an Independence Curriculum on Self-Determination and Function in Middle School Autistic Students
    Onwumere, Dora D.
    Cruz, Yamaris M.
    Harris, Lauren, I
    Malfucci, Katherine A.
    Seidman, Steven
    Boone, Cynthia
    Patten, Kristie
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY SCHOOLS AND EARLY INTERVENTION, 2021, 14 (01) : 103 - 117
  • [29] Experiences of College Students With Disabilities and the Importance of Self-Determination in Higher Education Settings
    Getzel, Elizabeth Evans
    Thoma, Colleen A.
    CAREER DEVELOPMENT AND TRANSITION FOR EXCEPTIONAL INDIVIDUALS, 2008, 31 (02) : 77 - 84
  • [30] Assessment of the Self-Determination of Spanish Students with Intellectual Disabilities and other Educational Needs
    Gomez-Vela, Maria
    Verdugo Alonso, Miguel Angel
    Gonzalez Gil, Francisca
    Badia Corbella, Marta
    Wehmeyer, Michael L.
    EDUCATION AND TRAINING IN AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2012, 47 (01) : 48 - 57