The effects of cognitive abilities and task demands on tonic and phasic pupil sizes

被引:23
作者
Aminihajibashi, Samira [1 ]
Hagen, Thomas [1 ]
Andreassen, Ole A. [3 ,4 ]
Laeng, Bruno [1 ,2 ]
Espeseth, Thomas [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Dept Psychol, 1094 Blindern, N-0317 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, RITMO Ctr Interdisciplinary Studies Rhythm Time &, Oslo, Norway
[3] Oslo Univ Hosp, NORMENT Ctr, Div Mental Hlth & Addict, Oslo, Norway
[4] Univ Oslo, NORMENT Ctr, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[5] Bjorknes Coll, Lovisenberggata 13, N-0456 Oslo, Norway
关键词
Individual differences; General cognitive ability; State-specific effect; Arousal; Mental effort; Pupil size; Locus coeruleus- norepinephrine system; MULTIPLE-OBJECT TRACKING; WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY; LOCUS-COERULEUS; FLUID INTELLIGENCE; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; ADAPTIVE GAIN; RESTING-STATE; ATTENTION; RESPONSES; DIAMETER;
D O I
10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107945
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Previous studies on individual differences in pupil size of healthy individuals and their relation to performance have been inconclusive. Using a novel approach, we tested the effect of general cognitive abilities and level of task performance on pretrial baseline and task-evoked pupil (TEP) sizes (N = 116) while we manipulated the level of task demands using a multiple object tracking task. Results did not reveal an effect of general cognitive abilities, estimated by working memory capacity and gF scores, on either baseline or TEP sizes. In contrast, we found an interaction in TEP sizes between level of overall MOT performance and task demands. We propose that individual differences in TEP sizes are related to state-specific level of task performance and task demands, probably in combination with other factors like age, personality traits, and state-specific level of motivation and arousal. We also suggest methodological confounds that may cause the previous inconclusive findings.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 123 条
[1]   PUPILLARY RESPONSES DURING INFORMATION-PROCESSING VARY WITH SCHOLASTIC APTITUDE-TEST SCORES [J].
AHERN, S ;
BEATTY, J .
SCIENCE, 1979, 205 (4412) :1289-1292
[2]   DIVISION OF ATTENTION - DISPROOF OF SINGLE CHANNEL HYPOTHESIS [J].
ALLPORT, DA ;
ANTONIS, B ;
REYNOLDS, P .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1972, 24 (MAY) :225-&
[3]   Pupil size signals mental effort deployed during multiple object tracking and predicts brain activity in the dorsal attention network and the locus coeruleus [J].
Alnaes, Dag ;
Sneve, Markus Handal ;
Espeseth, Thomas ;
Endestad, Tor ;
de Pavert, Steven Harry Pieter Van ;
Laeng, Bruno .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2014, 14 (04)
[4]   Independent resources for attentional tracking in the left and right visual hemifields [J].
Alvarez, GA ;
Cavanagh, P .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 16 (08) :637-643
[5]   How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism [J].
Alvarez, George A. ;
Franconeri, Steven L. .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2007, 7 (13)
[6]   Individual differences in resting-state pupil size: Evidence for association between working memory capacity and pupil size variability [J].
Aminihajibashi, Samira ;
Hagen, Thomas ;
Foldal, Maja Dyhre ;
Laeng, Bruno ;
Espeseth, Thomas .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 140 :1-7
[7]   Pupil and salivary indicators of autonomic dysfunction in autism spectrum disorder [J].
Anderson, Christa J. ;
Colombo, John ;
Unruh, Kathryn E. .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOBIOLOGY, 2013, 55 (05) :465-482
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2011, WECHSLER ABBREVIATED, DOI DOI 10.1037/T15170-000
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2018, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[10]   An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: Adaptive gain and optimal performance [J].
Aston-Jones, G ;
Cohen, JD .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 28 :403-450