Moral uncertainty in bioethical argumentation: a new understanding of the pro-life view on early human embryos

被引:9
作者
Zuradzki, Tomasz [1 ]
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ, Inst Philosophy, PL-31044 Krakow, Poland
关键词
Human embryo research; Moral status; Pro-life view; Decision theory; Normative uncertainty; PRINCIPLE;
D O I
10.1007/s11017-014-9309-1
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
In this article, I present a new interpretation of the pro-life view on the status of early human embryos. In my understanding, this position is based not on presumptions about the ontological status of embryos and their developmental capabilities but on the specific criteria of rational decisions under uncertainty and on a cautious response to the ambiguous status of embryos. This view, which uses the decision theory model of moral reasoning, promises to reconcile the uncertainty about the ontological status of embryos with the certainty about normative obligations. I will demonstrate that my interpretation of the pro-life view, although seeming to be stronger than the standard one, has limited scope and cannot be used to limit destructive research on human embryos.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 457
页数:17
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1985, BREAKING FAITH SANDI
[2]  
[Anonymous], DECL PROC AB
[3]  
[Anonymous], MATTERS LIFE DEATH
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, INSTRUCTION DIGNITAS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2008, STEM CELLS HUMAN EMB, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-6989-5_7
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1988, When did I begin? Conception of the human individual in history, philosophy and science
[8]  
Boonin David., 2003, A Defense of Abortion
[9]   Modelling the Moral Dimension of Decisions [J].
Colyvan, Mark ;
Cox, Damian ;
Steele, Katie .
NOUS, 2010, 44 (03) :503-529
[10]   Sixteen days?: A reply to B.!Smith and B.!Brogaard on the beginning of human individuals [J].
Damschen, G ;
Gómez-Lobo, A ;
Schönecker, D .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND PHILOSOPHY, 2006, 31 (02) :165-175