Maximum level of mobility with axillary deployment of the Impella 5.0 is associated with improved survival

被引:44
作者
Esposito, Michele L. [1 ]
Jablonski, Janelle [1 ]
Kras, Allison [1 ]
Krasney, Sara [1 ]
Kapur, Navin K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Med Ctr, CardioVasc Ctr, 800 Washington St,Box 80, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
Hemodynamics; mechanical circulatory support; CARDIOGENIC-SHOCK PATIENTS; SUPPORT; ACCESS; BRIDGE;
D O I
10.1177/0391398817752575
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Mobility is an important prognostic indicator for patients with cardiogenic shock. No studies have quantified peak mobility for patients with cardiogenic shock who are supported with the Impella 5.0 acute mechanical circulatory support device. The purpose of our study was to evaluate mobility levels among patients with cardiogenic shock being treated with an axillary Impella 5.0 pump. We retrospectively analyzed data from 19 patients receiving an Impella 5.0 device for cardiogenic shock at our institution from 2013 to 2016. We used the Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility Scale to quantify maximum mobility level achieved during active Impella 5.0 support. Higher scores on a scale of 1-8 indicated more mobility. Activity Measure for Post Acute Care Scores were quantified for each patient to assess activity limitations, with a maximum score 24. The mean age of the total cohort was 60 +/- 12 years, and the mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 16% +/- 6%. In-hospital mortality was 47% (n = 9). Of the 19 Impella 5.0 implants, 10 survived, 6 died from withdrawal of care, and 3 died from worsening heart failure/cardiogenic shock. Similar rates of mobilization during the time of Impella implant were seen between groups. Compared to non-survivors, survivors achieved a higher maximum Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility level, but similar Activity Measure for Post Acute Care scores. In conclusion, maximum mobility after Impella 5.0 implantation may be associated with improved survival. The clinical utility of exercise as a therapeutic intervention for patients requiring prolonged acute mechanical circulatory support requires further study.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 239
页数:4
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Bansal A, 2016, OCHSNER J, V16, P210
  • [2] Temporary Left Ventricular Assist Device Through an Axillary Access is a Promising Approach to Improve Outcomes in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Patients
    Doersch, Karen M.
    Tong, Carl W.
    Gongora, Enrique
    Konda, Subbareddy
    Sareyyupoglu, Basar
    [J]. ASAIO JOURNAL, 2015, 61 (03) : 253 - 258
  • [3] Percutaneous Placement of an Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in the Left Axillary/Subclavian Position Provides Safe, Ambulatory Long-Term Support as Bridge to Heart Transplantation
    Estep, Jerry D.
    Cordero-Reyes, Andrea M.
    Bhimaraj, Arvind
    Trachtenberg, Barry
    Khalil, Nashwa
    Loebe, Matthias
    Bruckner, Brian
    Orrego, Carlos M.
    Bismuth, Jean
    Kleiman, Neal S.
    Torre-Amione, Guillermo
    [J]. JACC-HEART FAILURE, 2013, 1 (05) : 382 - 388
  • [4] EARLY MOBILITY AND WALKING PROGRAM FOR PATIENTS IN INTENSIVE CARE UNITS: CREATING A STANDARD OF CARE
    Perme, Christiane
    Chandrashekar, Rohini
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2009, 18 (03) : 212 - 221
  • [5] Impella 5.0 Support in INTERMACS II Cardiogenic Shock Patients Using Right and Left Axillary Artery Access
    Schibilsky, David
    Lausberg, Henning
    Haller, Christoph
    Lenglinger, Matthias
    Woernle, Barbara
    Haeberle, Helene
    Rosenberger, Peter
    Walker, Tobias
    Schlensak, Christian
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2015, 39 (08) : 660 - 663