Twenty-one arguments against propensity analyses of probability

被引:40
作者
Eagle, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Dept Philosophy, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
关键词
Empirical Science; Successful Analysis; Propensity Analysis; Dispositional Analysis; Adequate Explication;
D O I
10.1023/B:ERKE.0000023408.61887.6a
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
I argue that any broadly dispositional analysis of probability will either fila to give an adequate explication of probability, or else will fail to provide an explication that can be gainfully employed elsewhere (for instance, in empirical science or in the regulation of credence). The diversity and number of arguments suggests that there is little prospect of any successful analysis along these lines.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 416
页数:46
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Albert D. Z., 2000, TIME CHANCE, DOI DOI 10.4159/9780674020139
[2]  
[Anonymous], PHILOS WRITINGS PEIR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1986, HIS PHILOS PAPERS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CHANCE PHYS
[5]  
[Anonymous], BASIC PROBLEMS METHO
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2003, PROBABILITY IS VERY
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1956, Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsreghnung
[8]  
[Anonymous], OXFORD HDB METAPHYSI
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1962, LOGICAL FDN PROBABIL
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1973, STUDIES LOGIC FDN MA