Low-frequency speech cues and simulated electric-acoustic hearing

被引:84
|
作者
Brown, Christopher A. [1 ]
Bacon, Sid P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Psychoacoust Lab, Dept Speech & Hearing Sci, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
acoustic signal processing; acoustoelectric effects; hearing; speech; speech intelligibility; COCHLEAR-IMPLANT; FUNDAMENTAL-FREQUENCY; PERCEPTUAL SEPARATION; RECOGNITION; RECEPTION; VOWELS; NOISE;
D O I
10.1121/1.3068441
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
The addition of low-frequency acoustic information to real or simulated electric stimulation (so-called electric-acoustic stimulation or EAS) often results in large improvements in intelligibility, particularly in competing backgrounds. This may reflect the availability of fundamental frequency (F0) information in the acoustic region. The contributions of F0 and the amplitude envelope (as well as voicing) of speech to simulated EAS was examined by replacing the low-frequency speech with a tone that was modulated in frequency to track the F0 of the speech, in amplitude with the envelope of the low-frequency speech, or both. A four-channel vocoder simulated electric hearing. Significant benefit over vocoder alone was observed with the addition of a tone carrying F0 or envelope cues, and both cues combined typically provided significantly more benefit than either alone. The intelligibility improvement over vocoder was between 24 and 57 percentage points, and was unaffected by the presence of a tone carrying these cues from a background talker. These results confirm the importance of the F0 of target speech for EAS (in simulation). They indicate that significant benefit can be provided by a tone carrying F0 and amplitude envelope cues. The results support a glimpsing account of EAS and argue against segregation.
引用
收藏
页码:1658 / 1665
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effects of the Configuration of Hearing Loss on Consonant Perception between Simulated Bimodal and Electric Acoustic Stimulation Hearing
    Yoon, Yang-Soo
    Whitaker, George
    Lee, Yune S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2021, 32 (08) : 521 - 527
  • [32] Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system -: New technology for severe hearing loss
    von Ilberg, C
    Kiefer, J
    Tillein, J
    Pfenningdorff, T
    Hartmann, R
    Stürzebecher, E
    Klinke, R
    ORL-JOURNAL FOR OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY AND ITS RELATED SPECIALTIES, 1999, 61 (06): : 334 - 340
  • [33] Speech Perception With Combined Electric-Acoustic Stimulation and Bilateral Cochlear Implants in a Multisource Noise Field
    Rader, Tobias
    Fastl, Hugo
    Baumann, Uwe
    EAR AND HEARING, 2013, 34 (03) : 324 - 332
  • [34] Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing
    Carroll, Jeff
    Tiaden, Stephanie
    Zeng, Fan-Gang
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2011, 130 (04) : 2054 - 2062
  • [35] Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing
    Imsiecke, Marina
    Krueger, Benjamin
    Buechner, Andreas
    Lenarz, Thomas
    Nogueira, Waldo
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2018, 364 : 25 - 37
  • [36] Influence of coding strategies in electric-acoustic hearing: A simulation dedicated to EAS cochlear implant, in the presence of noise
    Seldran, Fabien
    Gallego, Stephane
    Hung Thai-Van
    Berger-Vachon, Christian
    APPLIED ACOUSTICS, 2014, 76 : 300 - 309
  • [37] Contributions of Electric and Acoustic Hearing to Bimodal Speech and Music Perception
    Crew, Joseph D.
    Galvin, John J., III
    Landsberger, David M.
    Fu, Qian-Jie
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (03):
  • [38] Prevalence of potential candidates for electric-acoustic stimulation implant in a hearing-impaired population
    Saito, Kazuya
    Fujita, Takeshi
    Osaki, Yasuhiro
    Koyama, Hajime
    Shiraishi, Ko
    Kobayashi, Takaaki
    Sato, Mitsuo
    Seo, Toru
    Doi, Katsumi
    AURIS NASUS LARYNX, 2020, 47 (02) : 198 - 202
  • [39] Phantom Stimulation for Cochlear Implant Users With Residual Low-Frequency Hearing
    Krueger, Benjamin
    Buechner, Andreas
    Nogueira, Waldo
    EAR AND HEARING, 2022, 43 (02) : 631 - 645
  • [40] Frequency Overlap Between Electric and Acoustic Stimulation and Speech-Perception Benefit in Patients with Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation
    Zhang, Ting
    Spahr, Anthony J.
    Dorman, Michael F.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2010, 31 (02) : 195 - 201