Low-frequency speech cues and simulated electric-acoustic hearing

被引:84
|
作者
Brown, Christopher A. [1 ]
Bacon, Sid P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Psychoacoust Lab, Dept Speech & Hearing Sci, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
acoustic signal processing; acoustoelectric effects; hearing; speech; speech intelligibility; COCHLEAR-IMPLANT; FUNDAMENTAL-FREQUENCY; PERCEPTUAL SEPARATION; RECOGNITION; RECEPTION; VOWELS; NOISE;
D O I
10.1121/1.3068441
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
The addition of low-frequency acoustic information to real or simulated electric stimulation (so-called electric-acoustic stimulation or EAS) often results in large improvements in intelligibility, particularly in competing backgrounds. This may reflect the availability of fundamental frequency (F0) information in the acoustic region. The contributions of F0 and the amplitude envelope (as well as voicing) of speech to simulated EAS was examined by replacing the low-frequency speech with a tone that was modulated in frequency to track the F0 of the speech, in amplitude with the envelope of the low-frequency speech, or both. A four-channel vocoder simulated electric hearing. Significant benefit over vocoder alone was observed with the addition of a tone carrying F0 or envelope cues, and both cues combined typically provided significantly more benefit than either alone. The intelligibility improvement over vocoder was between 24 and 57 percentage points, and was unaffected by the presence of a tone carrying these cues from a background talker. These results confirm the importance of the F0 of target speech for EAS (in simulation). They indicate that significant benefit can be provided by a tone carrying F0 and amplitude envelope cues. The results support a glimpsing account of EAS and argue against segregation.
引用
收藏
页码:1658 / 1665
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Speech perception in simulated electric hearing exploits information-bearing acoustic change
    Stilp, Christian E.
    Goupell, Matthew J.
    Kluender, Keith R.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2013, 133 (02) : EL136 - EL141
  • [22] Hearing Preservation and Speech Perception Outcomes With Electric-Acoustic Stimulation After 12 Months of Listening Experience
    Adunka, Oliver F.
    Dillon, Margaret T.
    Adunka, Marcia C.
    King, English R.
    Pillsbury, Harold C.
    Buchman, Craig A.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2013, 123 (10) : 2509 - 2515
  • [23] Incidence of Cochlear Implant Electrode Contacts in the Functional Acoustic Hearing Region and the Influence on Speech Recognition with Electric-Acoustic Stimulation
    Nix, Evan P.
    Thompson, Nicholas J.
    Brown, Kevin D.
    Dedmon, Matthew M.
    Selleck, A. Morgan
    Overton, Andrea B.
    Canfarotta, Michael W.
    Dillon, Margaret T.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2023, 44 (10) : 1004 - 1010
  • [24] Impact of Low-Frequency Hearing
    Buechner, A.
    Schuessler, M.
    Battmer, R. D.
    Stoever, T.
    Lesinski-Schiedat, A.
    Lenarz, T.
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2009, 14 : 8 - 13
  • [25] Speech masking release in Hybrid cochlear implant users: Roles of spectral and temporal cues in electric-acoustic hearinga)
    Tejani, Viral D.
    Brown, Carolyn J.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2020, 147 (05) : 3667 - 3683
  • [26] Low-frequency signals support perceptual organization of implant-simulated speech for adults and children
    Nittrouer, Susan
    Tarr, Eric
    Bolster, Virginia
    Caldwell-Tarr, Amanda
    Moberly, Aaron C.
    Lowenstein, Joanna H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2014, 53 (04) : 270 - 284
  • [27] Contribution of Consonant Landmarks to Speech Recognition in Simulated Acoustic-Electric Hearing
    Chen, Fei
    Loizou, Philipos C.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2010, 31 (02) : 259 - 267
  • [28] The effect of cross-over frequency on binaural hearing performance of adults using electric-acoustic stimulation
    Incerti, Paola, V
    Ching, Teresa Yc
    Cowan, Robert
    COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 20 (04) : 190 - 206
  • [29] Speech perception with electric-acoustic stimulation. Comparison with bilateral cochlear implant users in different noise conditions
    Rader, T.
    HNO, 2015, 63 (02) : 85 - 93
  • [30] Psychoacoustic and electrophysiological electric-acoustic interaction effects in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing
    Imsiecke, Marina
    Buechner, Andreas
    Lenarz, Thomas
    Nogueira, Waldo
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2020, 386