Impella use in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest: Analysis of 10 years registry data

被引:23
作者
Davidsen, Cedric [1 ]
Packer, Erik J. S. [1 ]
Loland, Kjetil H. [1 ]
Rotevatn, Svein [1 ]
Nygreen, Else L. [1 ]
Eriksen, Erlend [1 ]
Oksnes, Anja [1 ]
Herstad, Jon [1 ]
Haaverstad, Rune [1 ,2 ]
Bleie, Oyvind [1 ]
Tuseth, Vegard [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Haukeland Hosp, Dept Heart Dis, Jonas Lies Vei 65, N-5021 Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Bergen, Fac Med, Bergen, Norway
关键词
Cardiogenic shock; Mechanical circulatory support; Left ventricular assist device; Acute myocardial infarction; LEFT-VENTRICULAR ASSIST; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON COUNTERPULSATION; CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; DEVICE; GUIDELINES; MORTALITY; ESC;
D O I
10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.04.022
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Aims: To assess characteristics and outcome of patients treated with Impella for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by severe cardiogenic shock (CS) or cardiac arrest (CA). Methods and results: From 2008 through 2017, 92 patients with AMI complicated by CS were treated with Impella. Survival varied according to clinical presentation. Patients in cardiogenic shock without CA had a75 degrees 030-day survival. Patients with CA and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) had a 43% survival and those with CA and ongoing cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) had a 6%30-day survival. Age, pre-existing hypertension, coronary disease, ventilatory support and use of adrenergic agents were associated with worse prognosis. Complications were predominantly access site related. Conclusions: In this registry of patients with AMICS treated with Impella, hypertension and older age were found to be negatively predictive for survival. Patients without CA had the highest 30-day survival. In patients with ROSC, survival was strongly related to age and comorbidity. Patients with ongoing CPR had very high mortality.
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 184
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Role of Impella in Cardiogenic Shock Complicated by an Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis
    Sassani, Kiarash
    Waechter, Christian
    Syntila, Styliani
    Kreutz, Julian
    Markus, Birgit
    Patsalis, Nikolaos
    Di Vece, Davide
    Schieffer, Bernhard
    Templin, Christian
    Chatzis, Georgios
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2025, 14 (02)
  • [2] Impella in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: History and Current Controversies
    Panhwar, Muhammad Siyab
    Reed, Grant W.
    Jain, Vardhmaan
    Ayoub, Ali
    Menon, Venu
    Lahorra, Joseph A.
    Kanaa'N, Anmar
    Hedrick, David P.
    Kapadia, Samir R.
    LeJemtel, Thierry
    Kalra, Ankur
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 34 (10) : E709 - E719
  • [3] Impella versus IABP in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
    Alushi, Brunilda
    Douedari, Andel
    Froehlig, Georg
    Knie, Wulf
    Wurster, Thomas H.
    Leistner, David M.
    Staehli, Barbara-Elisabeth
    Mochmann, Hans-Christian
    Pieske, Burkert
    Landmesser, Ulf
    Krackhardt, Florian
    Skurk, Carsten
    OPEN HEART, 2019, 6 (01):
  • [4] The Association between Cardiac Arrest and Mortality in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
    Xiao, Qian-feng
    Wei, Xin
    Wang, Si
    Xu, Ying
    Yang, Yan
    Huang, Fang-yang
    Chen, Mao
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2024, 25 (08)
  • [5] The Current Use of Impella 2.5 in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: Results from the USpella Registry
    O'Neill, William W.
    Schreiber, Theodore
    Wohns, David H. W.
    Rihal, Charanjit
    Naidu, Srihari S.
    Civitello, Andrew B.
    Dixon, Simon R.
    Massaro, Joseph M.
    Maini, Brijeshwar
    Ohman, E. Magnus
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 27 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [6] Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock in Ukraine: multicentre registry analysis 2021-2022
    Bilchenko, Anton O.
    Gritsenko, Olga V.
    Kolisnyk, Volodymir O.
    Rafalyuk, Oleg I.
    Pyzhevskii, Andrii V.
    Myzak, Yaroslav V.
    Besh, Dmytro I.
    Salo, Victor M.
    Chaichuk, Sergii O.
    Lehoida, Mykhailo O.
    Danylchuk, Ihor V.
    Polivenok, Ihor V.
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [7] Vasopressors for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
    Prondzinsky, R.
    Hirsch, K.
    Wachsmuth, L.
    Buerke, M.
    Unverzagt, S.
    MEDIZINISCHE KLINIK-INTENSIVMEDIZIN UND NOTFALLMEDIZIN, 2019, 114 (01) : 21 - 29
  • [8] Current clinical management of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
    El Nasasra, Aref
    Zeymer, Uwe
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2021, 19 (01) : 41 - 46
  • [9] Long term survival after early unloading with Impella CP® in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
    Loehn, Tobias
    O'Neill, William W.
    Lange, Bjoern
    Pfluecke, Christian
    Schweigler, Tina
    Mierke, Johannes
    Waessnig, Nadine
    Mahlmann, Adrian
    Youssef, Akram
    Speiser, Uwe
    Strasser, Ruth H.
    Ibrahim, Karim
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE, 2020, 9 (02) : 149 - 157
  • [10] Antiplatelet therapy in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
    Dettling, Angela
    Huber, Kurt
    Kristensen, Steen D.
    Aradi, Daniel
    Schrage, Benedikt
    Clemmensen, Peter
    CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2025,