A Numerical Modeling of Failure Mechanism for SiC Particle Reinforced Metal-Metrix Composites

被引:3
作者
Ouyang, Qiubao [1 ]
Zhang, Di [1 ]
Zhu, Xinhai [2 ]
Han, Zhidong [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, State Key Laborary Met Matrix Composites, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[2] Livermore Software Technol Corp, Livermore, CA 94551 USA
来源
CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA | 2014年 / 41卷 / 01期
关键词
computational micromechanics; particle-reinforced composites; debonding; MLPG-Eshelby Method; MATRIX COMPOSITES; BEHAVIOR; INTERFACE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The present work is to investigate the failure mechanisms in the deformation of silicon carbide (SiC) particle reinforced aluminum Metal Matrix Composites (MMCs). To better deal with crack growth, a new numerical approach: the MLPG-Eshelby Method is used. This approach is based on the meshless local weak-forms of the Noether/Eshelby Energy Conservation Laws and it achieves a faster convergent rate and is of good accuracy. In addition, it is much easier for this method to allow material to separate in the material fracture processes, comparing to the conventional popular FEM based method. Based on a statistical method and physical observations, the hard SiC particles are distributed randomly over the cubic space of the matrix. Four failure mechanisms are found to be critical to the accurate prediction of the mechanical properties of MMCs: a) the failure inside the matrix; b) the failure between the interface of aluminum matrix and the SiC particles; c) the fracture of the SiC particles; and d) the separation of two neighboring SiC particles. Plastic work is used as a failure criterion. It is found that the current approach can accurately predict the mechanical behavior of MMCs, including Young's moduls, stress strain curve, tensile strength, and limit strain. When the SiC volume fraction is low, the interface failure is more important; while for the case of high SiC volume fraction, all the four failure mechanisms work together to affect the mechanical property for the composite structure.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 53
页数:17
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   PARTICLE REINFORCEMENT OF DUCTILE MATRICES AGAINST PLASTIC-FLOW AND CREEP [J].
BAO, G ;
HUTCHINSON, JW ;
MCMEEKING, RM .
ACTA METALLURGICA ET MATERIALIA, 1991, 39 (08) :1871-1882
[2]   Microstructure-based modeling of the deformation behavior of particle reinforced metal matrix composites [J].
Chawla, N ;
Chawla, KK .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2006, 41 (03) :913-925
[3]  
Chawla N, 2001, ADV ENG MATER, V3, P357, DOI 10.1002/1527-2648(200106)3:6<357::AID-ADEM357>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-I
[5]   Toughness of a patterned interface between two elastically dissimilar solids [J].
Cordisco, Fernando A. ;
Zavattieri, Pablo D. ;
Hector, Louis G., Jr. ;
Bower, Allan F. .
ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2012, 96 :192-208
[6]   Modeling of metal matrix composites by a self-consistent embedded cell model [J].
Dong, M ;
Schmauder, S .
ACTA MATERIALIA, 1996, 44 (06) :2465-2478
[7]  
Han ZD, 2014, CMES-COMP MODEL ENG, V97, P199
[8]   Microstructural factors controlling the strength and ductility of particle-reinforced metal-matrix composites [J].
Llorca, J ;
Gonzalez, C .
JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICS AND PHYSICS OF SOLIDS, 1998, 46 (01) :1-28
[9]   Adhesion and adhesive transfer at aluminum/diamond interfaces: A first-principles study [J].
Qi, Y ;
Hector, LG .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2004, 69 (23) :235401-1
[10]  
Schmauder S, 2011, MATER SCI FORUM, V678, P49, DOI 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.678.49