Systematic uncertainty reduction strategies for developing streamflow forecasts utilizing multiple climate models and hydrologic models

被引:23
作者
Singh, Harminder [1 ]
Sankarasubramanian, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Civil Construct & Environm Engn, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
Model Uncertainty; Model Combination; Streamflow Forecasts; Climate Forecasts; SOIL-MOISTURE; UNITED-STATES; COMBINATION; HYDROCLIMATOLOGY; WEATHER;
D O I
10.1002/2013WR013855
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Recent studies show that multimodel combinations improve hydroclimatic predictions by reducing model uncertainty. Given that climate forecasts are available from multiple climate models, which could be ingested with multiple watershed models, what is the best strategy to reduce the uncertainty in streamflow forecasts? To address this question, we consider three possible strategies: (1) reduce the input uncertainty first by combining climate models and then use the multimodel climate forecasts with multiple watershed models (MM-P), (2) ingest the individual climate forecasts (without multimodel combination) with various watershed models and then combine the streamflow predictions that arise from all possible combinations of climate and watershed models (MM-Q), (3) combine the streamflow forecasts obtained from multiple watershed models based on strategy (1) to develop a single streamflow prediction that reduces uncertainty in both climate forecasts and watershed models (MM-PQ). For this purpose, we consider synthetic schemes that generate streamflow and climate forecasts, for comparing the performance of three strategies with the true streamflow generated by a given hydrologic model. Results from the synthetic study show that reducing input uncertainty first (MM-P) by combining climate forecasts results in reduced error in predicting the true streamflow compared to the error of multimodel streamflow forecasts obtained by combining streamflow forecasts from all-possible combination of individual climate model with various hydrologic models (MM-Q). Since the true hydrologic model structure is unknown, it is desirable to consider MM-PQ as an alternate choice that reduces both input uncertainty and hydrologic model uncertainty. Application on two watersheds in NC also indicates that reducing the input uncertainty first is critical before reducing the hydrologic model uncertainty. Key Points Reducing climatic uncertainty plays a critical role in developing streamflow forecasts Hydrologic models forced with multimodel climate forecasts perform better Systematic uncertainty reduction results in improved streamflow forecasts
引用
收藏
页码:1288 / 1307
页数:20
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   An integrated hydrologic Bayesian multimodel combination framework: Confronting input, parameter, and model structural uncertainty in hydrologic prediction [J].
Ajami, Newsha K. ;
Duan, Qingyun ;
Sorooshian, Soroosh .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2007, 43 (01)
[2]   The INGV-CMCC Seasonal Prediction System: Improved Ocean Initial Conditions [J].
Alessandri, Andrea ;
Borrelli, Andrea ;
Masina, Simona ;
Cherchi, Annalisa ;
Gualdi, Silvio ;
Navarra, Antonio ;
Di Pietro, Pierluigi ;
Carril, Andrea F. .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2010, 138 (07) :2930-2952
[3]   Multimodel ensembling in seasonal climate forecasting at IRI [J].
Barnston, AG ;
Mason, SJ ;
Goddard, L ;
DeWitt, DG ;
Zebiak, SE .
BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2003, 84 (12) :1783-+
[4]   Seasonal Hydrologic Forecasting: Do Multimodel Ensemble Averages Always Yield Improvements in Forecast Skill? [J].
Bohn, Theodore J. ;
Sonessa, Mergia Y. ;
Lettenmaier, Dennis P. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2010, 11 (06) :1358-1372
[5]   Long-Range Nino-3.4 Predictions Using Pairwise Dynamic Combinations of Multiple Models [J].
Chowdhury, Shahadat ;
Sharma, Ashish .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2009, 22 (03) :793-805
[6]   Improved categorical winter precipitation forecasts through multimodel combinations of coupled GCMs [J].
Devineni, Naresh ;
Sankarasubramanian, A. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2010, 37
[7]   Multimodel ensembles of streamflow forecasts: Role of predictor state in developing optimal combinations [J].
Devineni, Naresh ;
Sankarasubramanian, A. ;
Ghosh, Sujit .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2008, 44 (09)
[8]   Multi-model ensemble hydrologic prediction using Bayesian model averaging [J].
Duan, Qingyun ;
Ajami, Newsha K. ;
Gao, Xiaogang ;
Sorooshian, Soroosh .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2007, 30 (05) :1371-1386
[9]   Stochastic capture zone delineation within the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation methodology: Conditioning on head observations [J].
Feyen, L ;
Beven, KJ ;
De Smedt, F ;
Freer, J .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2001, 37 (03) :625-638
[10]   Towards the characterization of streamflow simulation uncertainty through multimodel ensembles [J].
Georgakakos, KP ;
Seo, DJ ;
Gupta, H ;
Schaake, J ;
Butts, MB .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2004, 298 (1-4) :222-241