Increased Hydrostatic Pressure Promotes Primary M1 Reaction and Secondary M2 Polarization in Macrophages

被引:7
|
作者
Wang, Bo [1 ]
Kasper, Maren [1 ]
Laffer, Bjoern [1 ]
Meyer zu Hoerste, Gerd [2 ,3 ]
Wasmuth, Susanne [1 ]
Busch, Martin [1 ]
Jalilvand, Tida Viola [1 ]
Thanos, Solon [4 ]
Heiligenhaus, Arnd [1 ,5 ]
Bauer, Dirk [1 ]
Heinz, Carsten [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] St Franziskus Hosp, Ophthalmol & Ophtha Lab, Munster, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikum Munster, Inst Neurol, Munster, Germany
[3] Univ Klinikum Munster, Inst Translat Neurol, Munster, Germany
[4] Westfalische Wilhelms Univ, Inst Expt Ophthalmol, Munster, Germany
[5] Univ Duisburg Essen, Ophthalmol, Essen, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY | 2020年 / 11卷
关键词
macrophage; increased hydrostatic pressure; secondary glaucoma; dexamethasone (DEX); ECM-extracellular matrix; M1; M2; balance; HUMAN TRABECULAR MESHWORK; ISCHEMIA-REPERFUSION INJURY; TNF-ALPHA; INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE; EXTRACELLULAR-MATRIX; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; CELL SURVIVAL; IN-VIVO; DEXAMETHASONE;
D O I
10.3389/fimmu.2020.573955
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Patients with chronic anterior uveitis are at particularly high risk of developing secondary glaucoma when corticosteroids [e.g., dexamethasone (Dex)] are used or when inflammatory activity has regressed. Macrophage migration into the eye increases when secondary glaucoma develops and may play an important role in the development of secondary glaucoma. Our aim was to evaluate in vitro if increased hydrostatic pressure and corticosteroids could induce changes in macrophages phenotype. By using a pressure chamber cell culture system, we assessed the effect of increased hydrostatic pressure (HP), inflammation, and immunosuppression (Dex) on the M1/M2 phenotype of macrophages. Bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) were stimulated with medium, lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 100 ng/ml), Dex (200 ng/ml), or LPS + Dex and incubated with different HP (0, 20, or 60 mmHg) for 2 or 7 days. The numbers of CD86+/CD206- (M1 phenotype), CD86-/CD206+ (M2 phenotype), CD86+/CD206+ (intermediate phenotype), F4/80+/TNF-alpha+, and F4/80+/IL-10+ macrophages were determined by flow cytometry. TNF-alpha and IL-10 levels in cell culture supernatants were quantified by ELISA. TNF-alpha, IL-10, fibronectin, and collagen IV expression in BMDMs were detected by immunofluorescence microscopy. Higher HP polarizes macrophages primarily to an M1 phenotype (LPS, 60 vs. 0 mmHg, d2: p = 0.0034) with less extra cellular matrix (ECM) production and secondary to an M2 phenotype (medium, 60 vs. 0 mmHg, d7: p = 0.0089) (medium, 60 vs. 20 mmHg, d7: p = 0.0433) with enhanced ECM production. Dex induces an M2 phenotype (Dex, medium vs. Dex, d2: p < 0.0001; d7: p < 0.0001) with more ECM production. Higher HP further increased M2 polarization of Dex-treated macrophages (Dex, 60 vs. 0 mmHg, d2: p = 0.0417; d7: p = 0.0454). These changes in the M1/M2 phenotype by high HP or Dex treatment may play a role in the pathogenesis of secondary uveitic glaucoma- or glucocorticoid (GC)-induced glaucoma.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] TUMOR TREATING FIELDS (TTFIELDS) INDUCE AN ALTERED POLARIZATION PROGRAM IN M1/M2 MACROPHAGES
    Barsheshet, Yiftah
    Brant, Boris
    Voloshin, Tali
    Volodin, Alexandra
    Koren, Lilach
    Klein-Goldberg, Anat
    Zemer-Tov, Efrat
    Paz, Rom
    Giladi, Moshe
    Weinberg, Uri
    Palti, Yoram
    JOURNAL FOR IMMUNOTHERAPY OF CANCER, 2021, 9 : A756 - A756
  • [32] Notch Signaling Determines the M1 versus M2 Polarization of Macrophages in Antitumor Immune Responses
    Wang, Yao-Chun
    He, Fei
    Feng, Fan
    Liu, Xiao-Wei
    Dong, Guang-Ying
    Qin, Hong-Yan
    Hu, Xing-Bin
    Zheng, Min-Hua
    Liang, Liang
    Feng, Lei
    Liang, Ying-Min
    Han, Hua
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 70 (12) : 4840 - 4849
  • [33] MiR-451a enhances the phagocytosis and affects both M1 and M2 polarization in macrophages
    Liu, Xiaoli
    Zhang, Dongyue
    Wang, Hao
    Ren, Qian
    Wang, Lina
    Zheng, Guoguang
    CELLULAR IMMUNOLOGY, 2021, 365
  • [34] Differential Effects of Nanoparticle Surface-Functionalization on the Polarization Profiles of M1 and M2 Macrophages
    Syrovets, T.
    Haas, K.
    Loos, C.
    Musyanovych, A.
    Mailaender, V
    Landfester, K.
    Simmet, T.
    NAUNYN-SCHMIEDEBERGS ARCHIVES OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 388 : S28 - S28
  • [35] Polarization and Characterization of M1 and M2 Human Monocyte-Derived Macrophages on Implant Surfaces
    Mohammadnejad, Leila
    Conrady, Hannah
    Mangold, Madeline
    Kimmerle-Mueller, Evi
    Hechler, Annika
    von Ohle, Christiane
    Rupp, Frank
    Krajewski, Stefanie
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2024, (214):
  • [36] Substance P as a novel cytokine for induction of alternatively activated M2 polarization and skewing M2 from M1 type of macrophages
    Lim, Ji Eun
    Chung, EunKyung
    Son, Youngsook
    CYTOKINE, 2015, 76 (01) : 68 - 68
  • [37] M1 and M2 macrophages' clinicopathological significance in cutaneous melanoma
    Falleni, Monica
    Savi, Federica
    Tosi, Delfina
    Agape, Elena
    Cerri, Amilcare
    Moneghini, Laura
    Bulfamante, Gaetano P.
    MELANOMA RESEARCH, 2017, 27 (03) : 200 - 210
  • [38] Novel Markers to Delineate Murine M1 and M2 Macrophages
    Jablonski, Kyle A.
    Amici, Stephanie A.
    Webb, Lindsay M.
    Ruiz-Rosado, Juan de Dios
    Popovich, Phillip G.
    Partida-Sanchez, Santiago
    Guerau-de-Arellano, Mireia
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (12):
  • [39] M1 AND M2 MACROPHAGES DIFFER IN THEIR ASSOCIATION WITH PLAQUE STABILITY
    Medbury, H. J.
    James, V.
    Ngo, J.
    Hitos, K.
    Fletcher, J. P.
    WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2012, 20 (05) : A74 - A74
  • [40] M1/M2 macrophages and their overlaps-myth or reality?
    Strizova, Zuzana
    Benesova, Iva
    Bartolini, Robin
    Novysedlak, Rene
    Cecrdlova, Eva
    Foley, Lily Koumbas
    Striz, Ilja
    CLINICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 137 (15) : 1067 - 1093