Assessment of Health Care Utilization and Cost of Targeted Drug Delivery and Conventional Medical Management vs Conventional Medical Management Alone for Patients With Cancer-Related Pain

被引:44
作者
Stearns, Lisa J. [1 ]
Narang, Sanjeet [2 ,3 ]
Albright, Robert E., Jr. [4 ]
Hammond, Krisstin [1 ]
Xia, Ying [5 ]
Richter, Heather Basara [6 ]
Paramanandam, Gobi K. [7 ]
Haagenson, Kelly K. [8 ]
Doth, Alissa H. [5 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Pain & Support Care, 4611 E Shea Blvd,Bldg 3,Ste 190, Phoenix, AZ 85028 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol Perioperat & Pain Med, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Anesthesiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Provectus, Knoxville, TN USA
[5] Medtronic, Hlth Econ & Outcomes Res, Minneapolis, MN USA
[6] Geomedicus LLC, New Orleans, LA USA
[7] Arizona Palliat Home Care, Phoenix, AZ USA
[8] Medtronic, Med & Sci Affairs, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
NORMALITY; THERAPY; END;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1549
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Targeted drug delivery (TDD) has potential for cost savings compared with conventional medical management (CMM). Despite positive clinical and economic evidence, TDD remains underused to treat cancer pain. OBJECTIVE To assess the cost of TDD and CMM in treating cancer-related pain. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective economic evaluation using propensity score-matched analysis was conducted using MarketScan commercial claims data on beneficiaries receiving TDD and CMM or CMM only for cancer pain from January 1, 2009, to September 30, 2015. Participants were matched on age, sex, cancer type, comorbidity score, and pre-enrollment characteristics. Data analysis was performed from June 1 to September 30, 2017. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Total 2-, 6-, and 12-month costs, number of health care encounters, length of hospital stay, additional components of cost, and health care utilization. RESULTS A total of 376 TDD and CMM patients (mean [SD] age, 51.88 [9.98] years; 216 [57.5%] female) and 4839 CMM only patients (mean [SD] age, 51.52 [11.16] years; 3005 [62.1%] female) were identified for study inclusion. After matching, 536 patients were included in the study: 268 patients in the TDD and CMM group and 268 in the CMM only group. Compared with CMM only, TDD and CMM was associated with mean total cost savings of $15 142 (95% CI, $3690 to $26 594; P = .01) at 2 months and $63 498 (95% CI, $4620 to $122 376; P = .03) at 12 months; cost savings at 6 months were not statistically different ($19 577; 95% CI, -$12 831 to $51 984; P = .24). The TDD and CMM group had fewer inpatient visits (2-month mean difference [MD], 1.0; 95% CI, 0.8-1.2; P < .001; 6-month MD, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.8-1.7; P < .001; 12-month MD, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2-3.4; P < .001) and shorter hospital stays (2-month MD, 6.8 days; 95% CI, 5.0-8.7 days; P < .001; 6-month MD, 6.8 days; 95% CI, 3.1-10.5 days; P < .001; 12-month MD, 10.6 days; 95% CI, 2.9-18.3 days; P = .007). Use of CMM only was associated with greater opioid use at 12 months (MD, 3.2; 95% CI, 0.4-6.0; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Compared with CMM alone, TDD and CMM together were associated with significantly lower cost and health care utilization. The findings suggest that TDD is a cost-saving therapy that should be considered in patients with cancer for whom oral opioids are inadequate or produce intolerable adverse effects and should be expanded as health care systems transition to value-based models.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, REP C MED PAYM POL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, HLTH CAR COST UT REP
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Cancer pain relief: with a guide to opioid availability
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, MED CARE US CITY AVE
[5]   Comparison of Site of Death, Health Care Utilization, and Hospital Expenditures for Patients Dying With Cancer in 7 Developed Countries [J].
Bekelman, Justin E. ;
Halpern, Scott D. ;
Blankart, Carl Rudolf ;
Bynum, Julie P. ;
Cohen, Joachim ;
Fowler, Robert ;
Kaasa, Stein ;
Kwietniewski, Lukas ;
Melberg, Hans Olav ;
Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje ;
Oosterveld-Vlug, Mariska ;
Pring, Andrew ;
Schreyoegg, Jonas ;
Ulrich, Connie M. ;
Verne, Julia ;
Wunsch, Hannah ;
Emanuel, Ezekiel J. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 315 (03) :272-283
[6]   Anticipating the "Silver Tsunami": Prevalence Trajectories and Comorbidity Burden among Older Cancer Survivors in the United States [J].
Bluethmann, Shirley M. ;
Mariotto, Angela B. ;
Rowland, Julia H. .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2016, 25 (07) :1029-1036
[7]   A Cost Utilization Analysis of Intrathecal Therapy for Refractory Cancer Pain: Identifying Factors Associated with Cost Benefit [J].
Brogan, Shane E. ;
Winter, Natalie Best ;
Abiodun, Annalise ;
Safarpour, Reza .
PAIN MEDICINE, 2013, 14 (04) :478-486
[8]   Successful Discontinuation of Systemic Opioids After Implantation of an Intrathecal Drug Delivery System [J].
Caraway, David ;
Walker, Valery ;
Becker, Laura ;
Hinnenthal, Jennifer .
NEUROMODULATION, 2015, 18 (06) :508-516
[9]   The Effectiveness and Risks of Long-Term Opioid Therapy for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review for a National Institutes of Health Pathways to Prevention Workshop [J].
Chou, Roger ;
Turner, Judith A. ;
Devine, Emily B. ;
Hansen, Ryan N. ;
Sullivan, Sean D. ;
Blazina, Ian ;
Dana, Tracy ;
Bougatsos, Christina ;
Deyo, Richard A. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 162 (04) :276-+
[10]   t-tests, non-parametric tests, and large studies-a paradox of statistical practice? [J].
Fagerland, Morten W. .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2012, 12