Economic efficiency of coordinated multilateral trades in electricity markets

被引:6
作者
Al-Agtash, S [1 ]
Su, RJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Yarmouk Univ, Dept Comp Engn, Irbid 21163, Jordan
关键词
economic efficiency; coordinated multilateral trades; PoolCo; electricity markets; deadweight efficiency loss;
D O I
10.1016/S0142-0615(01)00090-4
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
This paper presents economic efficiency evaluation of electricity markets operating on the basis of a coordinated multilateral trading concept. The evaluation accounts for the overall costs of power generation, network losses, and system and unit constraints. We assume a non-collusive oligopolistic competition. An iterative Cournot model is used to characterize the competitive behavior of suppliers. A supplier maximizes the profit of each of his generating units while taking rivals' generation as given. Time span is over multiple hours. This leads to a mixed integer non-linear programming problem. We use the augmented Lagrangian approach to solve iteratively for globally optimal schedules. An IEEE 24-bus, 8-supplier, and 17-customer test system is used for illustration. The results show that such a market at times of light demands exhibits little market power, and at times of large demands exhibits a great deal of market power. This contrasts with the PCMI and HHI concentration measures, which give fixed measurement values of market power. The results of two-year (730 round) market simulations show a range of deadweight efficiency loss between 0.9 and 6% compared to that of PoolCo which results in a range between 0.5 and 10% for the same test case. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:843 / 850
页数:8
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Hydrothermal scheduling by augmented Lagrangian: Consideration of transmission constraints and pumped-storage units [J].
Al-Agtash, S .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2001, 16 (04) :750-756
[2]   Augmented Lagrangian approach to hydro-thermal scheduling [J].
Al-Agtash, S ;
Su, RJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1998, 13 (04) :1392-1400
[3]  
ALAGTASH S, 1998, THESIS U COLORADO
[4]  
BAKER J, 1994, REGULATION COMPETITI
[5]  
BORENSTEIN S, 1999, PWP59R U CAL EN I
[6]  
BORENSTEIN S, 1996, MARKET POWER CALIFOR
[7]   A market mechanism for electric power transmission [J].
Chao, HP ;
Peck, S .
JOURNAL OF REGULATORY ECONOMICS, 1996, 10 (01) :25-59
[8]   COMPETITION IN THE BRITISH ELECTRICITY SPOT MARKET [J].
GREEN, RJ ;
NEWBERY, DM .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1992, 100 (05) :929-953
[9]  
HOGAN W, 1997, 2 ANN RES C BERK MAR
[10]  
Oren SS, 1997, ENERGY J, V18, P63